Well, presumably you will know whether you threw one stone only, or more than one. And, if you succeed in killing two birds, you will likely find two dead birds, nearby. However, there is the possibility that you could mortally wound one (or both) of the birds and one, or both, could fly some distance from you, before cooperating, and dying. That would be hard to ascertain, as birds often hide very effectively before they die. So perhaps the best way would be to make sure that you are very accurate and powerful in your throw. From a pragmatic standpoint, it certainly helps if the two birds are standing in line, one behind the other. That way, you don't have to use geometry and calculus to figure out the ricochet angle of your stone's throw.
Odysseus refrains from killing the Cyclops while he is asleep because the Cyclops is the only one who can move the large stone blocking the cave's entrance. If Odysseus were to kill the Cyclops while he slept, he and his men would be trapped in the cave with no way to escape. By keeping the Cyclops alive, Odysseus increases their chances of making a successful escape.
No, the Philosopher's Stone is a different magical object from the Deathly Hallows. The Philosopher's Stone is introduced in "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone" as a stone that grants immortality, while the Deathly Hallows are a trio of magical objects introduced in "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows" that represent different aspects of life and death.
Odysseus does not kill the cyclops when he has the chance because if he does he and his men will perish to considering the cyclops is the only one strong enough to move the slab of rock covering the doorway to the cave.
Odysseus doesn't kill the cyclops because if he does then no one can move the giant boulder that the cyclops put at the entrance so they couldn't escape. need more questions of any kind of greek myth i am your guy lol bye
The one truth that I know is that change is constant in life.
It means you could get two things done at one time or one trip.
Technically yes. You could either use a very large stone that would kill two birds (or more) at one time; else you could fire or throw the stone ensuring that it has enough velocity to kill first one bird and then the second.
They pick up a stone than because the birds are so close they throw it and it hits them so sad
Well, maybe its a different way of saying "kill two birds with one stone"...
Not at the risk of losing the first bird.
Kill two birds with one stone. (actually, kill two birds with one throw if you want the literal translation)
The phrase "kill two birds with one stone" is a common idiom that is used to describe completing two tasks with a single action. Its origin is uncertain, but it has been attributed to various sources throughout history.
It means you managed to get about two things done by only doing one thing.
The duration of One Stone Two Birds is 1.83 hours.
Yes. You either have to be very lucky, have a very big stone, or somehow trap the birds first. Or you could use flightless birds, like penguins. But the more important question is, why would you?
One Stone Two Birds was created on 2005-01-16.
Out of sight, out of mind. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Don't count your chickens before they are hatched. Kill two birds with one stone. The early bird gets the worm. (Don't know why so many are about birds...)