A right mind typically exposes a wrong mind's scheme by detecting inconsistencies, falsehoods, or unethical behavior in the scheme. Through critical thinking, reasoning, and moral judgment, a right mind can unravel the intentions and flaws in a wrong mind's scheme, bringing them to light and preventing harm or deception.
No, being right and wrong are mutually exclusive. Being right means that your statement or belief aligns with reality or truth, while being wrong means it does not. It is possible to change your mind and go from being wrong to right, or vice versa.
Since this is a philosophical question, I can only give a philosophical answer. I feel it is better to be wrong for the right reason rather than to be right for the wrong reason. If one is wrong for the right reason, then I feel they at least had good intentions. If one is right for the wrong reason, then I would have to wonder if their intentions were the right ones in the first place. But the really important thing, in my "philosophical" answer, is for one to be able and willing to admit when they are wrong.
herodotus
No, two wrongs do not make a right. It is not justified to respond to a wrong with another wrong. Instead, it is important to address the situation in a fair and ethical manner.
Right and wrong are subjective concepts shaped by individual beliefs, cultural norms, and ethical frameworks. What is considered right to one person may be seen as wrong by another. It is important to consider different perspectives and values when evaluating moral judgments.
Right-mind exposes wrong-mind's scheme by being vigilant and discerning, recognizing the deception or manipulation at play. It does this by staying true to values, ethics, and truth, which helps to reveal the flaws in wrong-mind's actions or intentions. By maintaining clarity and wisdom, right-mind can effectively counteract and ultimately thwart wrong-mind's scheme.
The word is 'wrong'. Wrong is right if spelt wrong and if wrong is spelt right it is still wrong
he was not. criminal minds was wrong.
animals don't understand reasoning, which is why they need repetition to learn. they can't be told like a person what is right and what is wrong, and be expected to make a moral decision. they have to be taught over and over the wrong thing versus the right thing for it to click in their minds what they are allowed and not allowed to do.
The answer is "wrong." Because if you say the word "right," it's incorrect because the answer is "wrong." But if you say the word "wrong," you are correct because the answer is "wrong."
He ment anythings possible you just gotta believe in it. email me back if you think im wrong or right. marcos85nsw@hotmail.com
Wrong
That's an interesting philosiphy but...... its wrong ! If something is right it is right . If something is wrong it is wrong but who is saying what is wrong and who is saying what is right ?_________________________________________ _______________________Although you said what is right so ... hey its just wrong okay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!_______________________________________________________________It is wrong.The above statetment is wrong when you read it rightly while it is right when you read it wrongly.
Not really. The "under development scheme" is particularly wrong.
The word "wrong".
The word "wrong."
He ment anythings possible you just gotta believe in it. Email me back if you think im wrong or right. marcos85nsw@hotmail.com