0
How does the way scientists today develop ideas differ from the way the greek philosophers developed ideas?
Scientists today rely heavily on empirical evidence, experimentation, and peer review to develop and validate their ideas, while Greek philosophers used more deductive reasoning, logic, and thought experiments. Additionally, modern scientists work within established frameworks and theories, building on existing knowledge through collaboration and specialization, whereas Greek philosophers often sought universal truths through individual contemplation and debate.
What else can I help you with?
How does the way scientist today develop ideas differ from the way the greek philosophers develop ideas?
Modern scientists tend to rely on the scientific method, which involves experimentation, observation, and empirical evidence to develop ideas. In contrast, ancient Greek philosophers developed ideas through contemplation, reasoning, and dialogue, often based on logic and rational argumentation without necessarily relying on systematic experimentation or empirical evidence.
How long does it take for lung cancer to develop from smoking?
The development of lung cancer from smoking can vary, but it typically takes several years of smoking before the disease may develop. However, the exact timeline can differ based on individual factors such as genetics, frequency of smoking, and overall health. It is important to note that quitting smoking at any time can reduce the risk of developing lung cancer.
How does philosophy differ from science?
Philosophy is concerned with understanding the nature of reality, knowledge, and existence through reasoning and reflection, whereas science aims to explain natural phenomena through empirical evidence and experimentation. Philosophy explores abstract concepts and principles, while science focuses on observable facts and data to develop theories and models. Both disciplines contribute to our understanding of the world, but they differ in their methodologies and areas of study.
In what way did some of the enlightenment thinkers differ in their views?
Some Enlightenment thinkers differed in their views on the role of religion in society. For example, while Voltaire advocated for religious tolerance and criticized organized religion, Rousseau believed in a more personal, emotional connection to spirituality. Additionally, philosophers like Locke focused on individual rights and freedoms, while Hobbes emphasized the need for strong governmental control to maintain order.
How did the Hellenistic philosophers differ from Aristotle in their perspectives of philosophy?
Hellenistic philosophy comes from a late period in Greek history which saw the greatest variety of philosophic schools. There is no single tenant of "helenistic philosophy" as it ranges from platonic forms to the cynics to Pythagoras. What seperates helenistic philosophy from other cultures and movements though, was the desire to understand the supernatural world logically. They trade to make sense of myths and traditions using the newly formed mathematics, social ethics, morality. As a result, many religions found themselves evolving under the Hellenistic microscope, not so much abandoning faith, as trying to find solid reason for it. This would later be revived in Christianity as the apologetics movement.
How does the way scientist today develop ideas differ from the way the greek philosophers develop ideas?
Modern scientists tend to rely on the scientific method, which involves experimentation, observation, and empirical evidence to develop ideas. In contrast, ancient Greek philosophers developed ideas through contemplation, reasoning, and dialogue, often based on logic and rational argumentation without necessarily relying on systematic experimentation or empirical evidence.
How did the development of the earliest idea about atoms differ from the later work of scientists?
The earliest idea about atoms, proposed by ancient Greek philosophers like Democritus, was based on philosophical reasoning and did not involve empirical evidence. In contrast, later scientists like Dalton and Thomson developed atomic theory based on experimental observations, such as the laws of chemical reactions and the discovery of subatomic particles. This shift from abstract philosophy to empirical observation marked a significant change in the approach to understanding atoms.
How do scientists and historians differ in their work How are their jobs similar?
Scientists work on different stuff then historians do.
How did Jean-Jacque Rousseau ideas differ from other Enlightenment philosophers?
emphasis on emotion and admirtation for the noble savage
Why is it best for scientists to use the scientific name of an organism instead of a common?
Scientific names never differ among scientists.
How does a scientists theory differ from a hypothesis?
Theories are proven. Hypothesis are ideas.
How do developing countries differ from developed countries?
the jobs and services are the same
How does the literacy of men and women nearly equal in developed countries differ in less developed countries?
Men have a higher rate.
Can you assume that the information needs and usage of behaviour of scientists in different disciplines will differ?
Yes.
How does the way scientists today develop ideas differ from the way the greek developed ideas?
The main difference is that the ancient Greeks - indeed practically everyone until the 17th century - used to simply believe what eminent people said; Aristotle said that house flies had four legs and that was the belief for hundreds of years. Ptolomy said that sailing over the equator would make a ship catch fire and everyone believed him. Nowadays, scientists employ the scientific method which, at its simplest, was described to me as "someone says something is true and everyone else tries to prove him wrong." Another more subtle difference is that Greek philosophers would probably claim they searched for truth; modern scientific progress is made by demonstrating existing theories false - so it's more a search for falseness than truth.
How did greek philosophers differ from others in determining why things happened in their world?
They differed because they used theology and cosmology to liberate their thoughts on why things happened in their world.
How does an emerging idea differ from scientific consensus?
An emerging idea has been examined by a large number of scientists.
