Philosophy is a humanity, therefore more accurately an art. There can be an element of science in the form of logic to philosophy, but it is far more than science.
Most scientists and most philosophers would not consider philosophy to be a science. However, both science and philosophy are characterized by very careful thought and analysis and scholarship. Both are engaged in an effort to understand the universe in which we live. However, scientists emphasize observation, while philosophers emphasize abstract thought. There is certainly some overlap between these subjects, and there is even such a subject as the philosophy of science. There is not, however, a science of philosophy.
Science without philosophy has no guide (is blind). It researches pointless things rather than what we want to know, like the origin of the universe and how to stop global warming. Philosophy without science has no substance (is empty): As an example, more than 2000 years ago, the Grecian philosopher Democritus came up with the idea of atoms, but it was just an idea without meaning until science developed to support his theory. We are just in a position to understand what is philosophy and science.Just may be a drop in the ocean. So let us allow the younger with their beliefs.Tomorrow these beliefs may correct.
Philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy that examines the foundations, methods, and implications of science. It explores questions about the nature of scientific knowledge, the scientific method, and the relationship between science and other areas of human inquiry.
It's because the German word "Philosophie" is feminine that it's called *queen* rather than *king* of the sciences. The word translated as "queen" is *Herrin*, literally "mistress", in the sense of a female master; but translating it as "mistress" would of course be misleading. Philosophy should be master of the sciences, because, to speak with Heidegger, science does not think. Philosophy itself is not a science, not even the "absolute science". It is something intrinsically different to science. Nietzsche said psychology should be the queen of the sciences, but not as something intrinsically different, but as one science among others (even as a king is one man among others). Psychology should be the king of the sciences, according to him, and philosophy should be like their God. This is because philosophy first gives the sciences a purpose
No, philosophy is not considered a science. While both disciplines aim to understand the world and address fundamental questions, they do so using different methodologies and approaches. Philosophy focuses on questions of existence, knowledge, values, ethics, and reasoning, while science is more concerned with empirically testing and investigating the natural world.
not definitely! they need each other because without techno, there would be no philosophy. _usepian
Metaphysics
Most scientists and most philosophers would not consider philosophy to be a science. However, both science and philosophy are characterized by very careful thought and analysis and scholarship. Both are engaged in an effort to understand the universe in which we live. However, scientists emphasize observation, while philosophers emphasize abstract thought. There is certainly some overlap between these subjects, and there is even such a subject as the philosophy of science. There is not, however, a science of philosophy.
Philosophy is no longer a field of Science at all. Science, specifically Physics, did develop from Philosophy, and other Sciences developed from Physics. This (above) explains the term "PhD" (Doctor of Philosophy) and "Physician". There are many differences between Philosophy and Science. The most important is probably that Science deals exclusively with physical objects (living or not), while Philosophy has a wider area of concern. Also, in Science, questions can (often) be answered by performing an experiment. If everyone agrees that the experiment was designed and done well, the results are accepted as "the correct answer." It is not like that in Philosophy.
Metaphysics
James H. Fetzer has written: 'Philosophy and Cognitive Science' 'Philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy 'Computers and cognition' -- subject(s): Cognitive science 'Glossary of epistemology/philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Dictionaries, Knowledge, Theory of, Philosophy, Science, Theory of Knowledge 'Artificial intelligence' -- subject(s): Artificial intelligence 'Philosophy and cognitive science' -- subject(s): Philosophy and cognitive science
Renaissance brought in more philosophy and science. This brought people together and to stand up for what they believe in.
Metaphysics
Metaphysics
Science relies on empirical evidence and systematic observation to understand the natural world, while religion relies on faith and spiritual beliefs, and philosophy involves critical thinking and reasoning to explore fundamental questions about existence and knowledge. Science aims to test hypotheses through experimentation and verification, while religion and philosophy often rely on personal experiences or abstract reasoning.
It is more of a philosophy than a religion. Just like buddhism is more of a philosophy than a religion as well.
Science without philosophy has no guide (is blind). It researches pointless things rather than what we want to know, like the origin of the universe and how to stop global warming. Philosophy without science has no substance (is empty): As an example, more than 2000 years ago, the Grecian philosopher Democritus came up with the idea of atoms, but it was just an idea without meaning until science developed to support his theory. We are just in a position to understand what is philosophy and science.Just may be a drop in the ocean. So let us allow the younger with their beliefs.Tomorrow these beliefs may correct.