Sometimes. It depends on what your nature is-evil or good or both
Ontological evil is the idea that evil is an inherent part of existence, rather than just a result of human actions. This concept challenges traditional views of morality by suggesting that evil is a fundamental aspect of the universe. It forces us to reconsider the nature of good and evil, and how we understand the purpose and meaning of existence.
In Taoism, good and evil are seen as part of the natural balance of the universe, with an emphasis on living in harmony with the Tao, or the way of nature. In Confucianism, good is defined by moral virtues such as benevolence, righteousness, and propriety, while evil is seen as the absence of these virtues.
Ontological evil refers to the existence of evil as an inherent part of the universe. It is the idea that evil is a fundamental aspect of reality, rather than just the result of human actions. This type of evil can manifest in various ways, such as natural disasters, diseases, and suffering. It is seen as a deep and intrinsic part of the world that cannot be fully explained or eradicated.
Thucydides believed that stasis, or civil strife, revealed the darker aspects of human nature such as selfishness, greed, and the pursuit of power. Through stasis, he saw how individuals would betray their own community for personal gain, leading to a breakdown of social order and morality.
Aristotle referred to the human mind or soul as the "rational soul" or "psyche." He considered it to be the highest part of a person, responsible for reasoning, understanding, and intellectual activity. In his philosophical works, he explored the nature of the soul and its role in human behavior and thought.
If you read William Golding's The Lord of the Flies, you will see that the theme of good vs. evil in human nature is a huge part. I think it's also probably present in the Hunger Games series.
Mother Nature is not inherently evil. Natural phenomena like hurricanes, earthquakes, and wildfires can cause destruction and harm, but they are not driven by malice. These events are part of the natural world's balance and are essential for the health and sustainability of ecosystems.
Ontological evil is the idea that evil is an inherent part of existence, rather than just a result of human actions. This concept challenges traditional views of morality by suggesting that evil is a fundamental aspect of the universe. It forces us to reconsider the nature of good and evil, and how we understand the purpose and meaning of existence.
you know already that human condition is a part of nature human is nature
In Taoism, good and evil are seen as part of the natural balance of the universe, with an emphasis on living in harmony with the Tao, or the way of nature. In Confucianism, good is defined by moral virtues such as benevolence, righteousness, and propriety, while evil is seen as the absence of these virtues.
To answer this you really need to look at what you mean by human nature.Are you asking, "is it natural for humans to commit evil acts?"To this end, then, yes evil is a part of human nature. Humans are driven by chemical impulses over which they seem to exhibit little control. These impulses are dependant on many factors that are difficult to tease apart, but they do certainly drive people to commit what are essentially evil acts.Are you asking "is evil justifiable by being referred to as a part of human nature?"To this end, I would say that no, Evil is an avoidable act (for a free person). The yardstick for evil is here important, and it could be said that it is impossible to avoid any evil actions, but you can choose the lesser of two evils when these are the only options present. So, some evil is certainly justifiable to this end, but it is most certainly not possible to justify the amount of evil in this world by dismissing it as part of human nature.Evil is a human construct, so in that regard it is also part of human nature. Without humans, there would be no concept of evil, but as to whether evil would still be present; yes, perhaps. There are feeling beings apart from us. Some have been suggested to kill for pleasure, which could certainly be considered evil, but the most common reply is that they are honing their hunting instincts. A 'neccesary' evil, such as killing for food could be considered in the best interests of survival, and if your definition of evil includes these 'necessary' evils, then evil most certainly exists in the world, with or without humans, and is, furthermore, unavoidable.Another Answer:Human Nature means what is inherent in all human. Living being in this world include human, animal and plant. The difference between human and animal is large due to what is inherent in human which animal does not have. Human has the mind to discrimate what is good and what is evil while animal does not. Like human, animal need to survive. They either 'fight' for survival or 'flight' for survival but they does not has the mind to discriminate good or bad. Sometime we use the word 'heart' or 'conscience' to describe this mind of discrimination. Although the 'heart' or 'conscience' is inherent in human, the level or standard or quality of this' heart' is not the same in everyone, e.g. the quality of heart of say, Hitler and that of Mother Teresa is defintely not the same or between a social worker and a murderer. For example, if you leave your money on the front seat of your 'unlock' car, 2 things could possibly happen - some one may steal your money or someone may lock your car on your behalf to prevent the money from being stolen; one has an evil intention while the other has good intention and this is due to the quality of the 'heart' or 'conscience' or the discriminating mind, which is inherent in all of us. So, what is evil or good depend on our 'heart'.
Ontological evil refers to the existence of evil as an inherent part of the universe. It is the idea that evil is a fundamental aspect of reality, rather than just the result of human actions. This type of evil can manifest in various ways, such as natural disasters, diseases, and suffering. It is seen as a deep and intrinsic part of the world that cannot be fully explained or eradicated.
The theme of a story offers insight into human nature.
Why not? Question everything. Questioning is not evil; far from it. It is part of what makes us fully human.
Hades is a neutral. Death can be both a good and a bad thing depending on how you look at it. But it is a necessary part of life, something that is unavoidable and happens to has all. I personally view Him as a positive influence.
Yes as earlier man was A chimpanzee basically a monkey
If you mean the song where Michael Jackson says "why oh why? Tell them that is human nature"? If so, this song is called Human nature and it is part of the Thriller Album.