Suppose a philosopher says, ignorance is devil. Then it would also mean, knowledge is god, which was enough for authorities to think that the philosopher was challenging them, for they had taught people that the Authority- King- was god. The job of the philosopher is to teach, not challenge, but examples like this can also be taken as subtle ways of challenging authorities. We know, it is ignorant and illiterate authorities who think philosophers are challenging them through their teachings. A Solomon or a Shibi or a Vikramaditya will not be challenged for they themselves were learned and wise, and philosophers themselves. That is why we come to the point raised by Plato- the concept of the inevitability of a Philosopher-King.
idk do you know i dont think so :/
Philosophers believed reason was important because it allowed individuals to think critically, make sound judgments, and arrive at logical conclusions. Reason was seen as a pathway to knowledge, truth, and understanding of the world. It was also considered essential for exploring and solving complex problems in ethics, politics, and metaphysics.
Philosophers contemplate various concepts such as ethics, reality, existence, knowledge, and the nature of the universe. They seek to understand fundamental questions about life, the mind, society, and the human experience. Philosophers analyze these topics through critical thinking, logic, and rational argumentation to provide insights into the nature of reality and human existence.
Plato believed that philosophers possessed the wisdom and knowledge needed to govern justly and effectively. He argued that rulers who were guided by reason and virtue, as philosophers are, would prioritize the well-being of the entire society over their own interests. This would lead to a harmonious and just society.
Suppose a philosopher says, ignorance is devil. Then it would also mean, knowledge is god, which was enough for authorities to think that the philosopher was challenging them, for they had taught people that the Authority- King- was god. The job of the philosopher is to teach, not challenge, but examples like this can also be taken as subtle ways of challenging authorities. We know, it is ignorant and illiterate authorities who think philosophers are challenging them through their teachings. A Solomon or a Shibi or a Vikramaditya will not be challenged for they themselves were learned and wise, and philosophers themselves. That is why we come to the point raised by Plato- the concept of the inevitability of a Philosopher-King.
Well,I don't think you can.
He thinks that Galileo was Venus and Jupiter
Blessed persona of nature.
Blessed persona of nature.
There are many things that could be considered an intellectual change. A person's change in the way they think could be an intellectual change.
because their fat!
AnswerA lot of things represent change.
I think you mean the freezing point. The freezing point of water is 32 degree's Fahrenheit.
A point where you can connect to the internet to access things. They have them at McDonald's and stuff I think.
I think it was Leonidas from classical Greece
I dont know about this please tell me about this