One is why do we and everything else exist? Another is, who is really running the "Big Show," or is it all "just happening?"
Science cannot provide answers to questions that are philosophical, ethical, or subjective in nature. These types of questions often involve personal beliefs, values, or opinions that are not within the scope of scientific inquiry.
Questions about morality, ethics, and subjective experiences fall outside the realm of science. Science deals with observable and measurable phenomena, while these topics involve personal beliefs, values, and emotions that cannot be easily studied using scientific methods.
Science can provide evidence and contribute to the understanding of philosophical questions, but it is not equipped to answer questions related to ethics, meaning of life, or existence of God. Philosophy and science often complement each other by exploring different aspects of complex issues.
Science can answer questions about the natural world through observation, experimentation, and evidence-based reasoning.
Contradictory questions are those that cannot both be true at the same time. For example, "Is the sky blue?" and "Is the sky not blue?" are contradictory questions because the sky cannot be both blue and not blue simultaneously.
which statement best describe the limit of science
science cannot answer questions about what people should do
Science is the application of strict procedures to quantify (observe and measure) all manner of events such as physical forces, human behavior, chemical reactions and biological processes. Hence, science is unable to answer questions where the subject matter cannot be quantified - but even those questions are eventually answered as methods are invented to observe and measure the subject matter.In its short history, science was once unable to answer questions such as: "what is the wind?" - thought to be the breath of gods until the measurement of matter was developed.So, although science cannot yet answer many lingering questions about ourselves and our world, it is only because we have yet to invent a way of observing the subject matter - and not because certain questions are "unanswerable" or "unknowable".
Science is limited in addressing questions that involve subjective experiences, moral values, and existential meaning, such as "What is the purpose of life?" or "Is there an absolute morality?" Additionally, questions about personal beliefs, feelings, and aesthetic judgments are inherently subjective and cannot be empirically tested. Science can inform these topics but cannot provide definitive answers.
Science has not yet figured out the answers to these questions.
Science questions are science questions.
Philosophy revolves around hypothetical questions that cannot be answered through observation. Science revolves around theoretical questions that can and have to be proven through experimentation to be valid.
An idea: much of science is founded on theories which are observed in everyday life, but cannot be proved. For example, science cannot physically prove that any two bodies with finite mass will be attracted by gravity. Theories and laws describe phenomena that cannot be proven.
Science can answer questions about our physical world.
The term that defines questions in science that cannot be addressed using the scientific method is "pseudo-science." These questions often pertain to areas that are not empirically testable or lack measurable evidence, such as metaphysical inquiries or philosophical debates. Pseudo-science may also refer to beliefs or practices that claim to be scientific but do not adhere to rigorous scientific standards.
Science cannot provide answers to questions that are philosophical, ethical, or subjective in nature. These types of questions often involve personal beliefs, values, or opinions that are not within the scope of scientific inquiry.
What colour are dinosaurs? How did life start? If you here something like 'It is likely...' 'Studies suggest...' 'It is believed that...' it's almost guaranteed that science hasn't solved it completely. A lot of things are based on guesses and theories that are revised over and over again as new information is found. (just look at the various atomic models!)