their great literary contribution was rhetoric
The Sophists were ancient Greek philosophers who emphasized the art of persuasive speaking and rhetoric. They were known for teaching the skills of argument and debate, often charging fees for their services. Socrates was critical of the Sophists, believing that they valued style over substance in their teachings.
Socrates believed that absolute standards of the good, true, and just exist objectively and can be known through reason, while the Sophists believed that these concepts are relative and subject to individual interpretation. Socrates argued that there are universal truths that are not mere products of opinion or persuasion, unlike the Sophists who emphasized rhetoric and persuasion to sway opinions rather than seeking objective truth.
Sophists believed that truth and morality are relative concepts that vary based on individual perspectives and circumstances. They emphasized the importance of persuasive arguments and rhetoric in communication and debate.
Socrates believed that the good, true, and justice were objective values that existed independently of individual opinions, and could be discovered through rational inquiry and dialogue. In contrast, the Sophists believed that these values were subjective and could vary from person to person, and they often used rhetoric and persuasion to argue their point of view, rather than seeking ultimate truth.
The Sophists were a group of ancient Greek teachers who focused on rhetoric, or the art of persuasion. They believed that truth was subjective and could be manipulated through persuasive language. Sophists were known for their skepticism and their ability to argue both sides of an issue.
The Sophists were ancient Greek philosophers who emphasized the art of persuasive speaking and rhetoric. They were known for teaching the skills of argument and debate, often charging fees for their services. Socrates was critical of the Sophists, believing that they valued style over substance in their teachings.
yes
True.
The Sophists made political speeches.
Socrates believed that absolute standards of the good, true, and just exist objectively and can be known through reason, while the Sophists believed that these concepts are relative and subject to individual interpretation. Socrates argued that there are universal truths that are not mere products of opinion or persuasion, unlike the Sophists who emphasized rhetoric and persuasion to sway opinions rather than seeking objective truth.
The leaders of Athens were unhappy with the sophists because the sophists argued that the rulers invented the gods in order to control the people of Athens.
The leaders of Athens were unhappy with the sophists because the sophists argued that the rulers invented the gods in order to control the people of Athens
How did the sophists and Socrates advance the tradition of reason and humanis
Sophists believed that truth and morality are relative concepts that vary based on individual perspectives and circumstances. They emphasized the importance of persuasive arguments and rhetoric in communication and debate.
The Sophists were professional teachers in ancient Greece.They believed students should use their time to improve themselves.
A Sophists
yes they were