Breaking the law may be justified in certain situations where it is necessary to prevent harm or injustice, protect oneself or others, or uphold fundamental human rights.
Breaking the law can be justified in certain circumstances when it is necessary to prevent harm or injustice, protect oneself or others, or uphold higher moral principles.
Breaking the law is generally not okay, as laws are in place to maintain order and protect society. However, there may be rare circumstances where breaking the law is justified, such as in cases of civil disobedience to protest unjust laws. It is important to consider the consequences and ethical implications before deciding to break the law.
Sharia law and the constitution are not fully compatible because Sharia law is based on Islamic principles, while the constitution is based on secular principles. However, individuals are free to practice their religion under the constitution as long as it does not violate the law.
A necessary truth is a statement that is true in all possible worlds and cannot be false. It is a proposition that is true by virtue of the meaning of the terms involved, regardless of empirical evidence or personal opinion. Examples include mathematical truths like 2+2=4 and logical principles like the law of noncontradiction.
Yes, killing a bald eagle is illegal under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, which is a federal law in the United States.
Breaking the law can be justified in certain circumstances when it is necessary to prevent harm or injustice, protect oneself or others, or uphold higher moral principles.
[A perennial law school question.] Under extenuating circumstances there can be moral justification for breaking a law. However there can never be any justification for living a lawless life.
Breaking the law is generally not okay, as laws are in place to maintain order and protect society. However, there may be rare circumstances where breaking the law is justified, such as in cases of civil disobedience to protest unjust laws. It is important to consider the consequences and ethical implications before deciding to break the law.
Under what circumstances apparent agency be recognized by law?
Breaking the law for moral reasons is a complex issue that often depends on the context. Some argue that civil disobedience can be justified when laws are unjust and violate fundamental human rights. However, others contend that upholding the rule of law is crucial for societal order, and that change should be pursued through legal means. Ultimately, the acceptability of breaking the law for moral reasons hinges on individual perspectives and the specific circumstances involved.
Matilda Roalfe has written: 'Law breaking justified' -- subject(s): Government, Resistance to, Philosophy, Resistance to Government
"Under what circumstances will you declare martial law?" means the same as "What will it take for you to declare martial law?". "Under what circumstances will black mold form?" means the same as "What conditions will result in black mold forming?" It asks what situation is required for the specified result to take place.
pools and rivers
Law enforcement can enter private property under certain circumstances, such as with a search warrant issued by a judge, when in pursuit of a suspect, or in emergency situations where there is a risk of harm or destruction of evidence.
it does in a way
It means you do not let anyone under no circumstances to take over on you!
You are under-age, doing this is breaking the law. You can go to prison from the age of 9 onwards for breaking the law.