0
It is hard to say, as there are different angles. It is not clearly stated when the story took place in nineteenth century Paris. if telephones were up and running- and say if this was the nineties- surely that was the style- she would, methinks,call the owner of the necklace up and explain exactly what happened- how the gems were accidentally lost- my guess is then the owner would explain to Mme Loisel that there was no worry and it was costume jewelry- or ( paste) as it is described in the story- the repayment and crash dive into poverty would have never happened- Honesty is the best policy. My guess if the author wanted to make fun of (society crashers) using gimmicks- in effect inverting the Cinderella plot device. O. Henry did a similar story about a bungled inheritance scheme- that was foiled by history- All iof the Money was Confederate. It takes two to swindle- assume that MMe Loisel immediately infomed ( my guess by telephone) the circumstances of the loss- she probably would have explained it was a (wearing copy) and that would end the story right there. By the way wearing copies of such things as Gold and Platinum war medals were worn by officers in the field and also by diplomats at Press conferences- to avoid loss.
What else can I help you with?
Put the following events of the lives of Mathilde and Loisel in order beginning with the earliest?
We learn that Mathilde loves clothes and jewels more than anything.Invited to a party but with nothing to wear, Mathilde gets her husband to buy her a new dress and borrows a necklace from a friend.Mathilde loses the necklace.Mathilde and her husband buy a new necklace and work for years to get out of debt after doing so.Mathilde runs into the friend, who does not even recognize her.
Why do you think did Mathilde Loisel act and think the way she did as far as her status in life was concerned-the diamond necklace?
Mathilde Loisel's actions and thoughts were influenced by her desire for wealth and social status. She believed that material possessions and appearances were crucial to happiness and acceptance in society. The allure of the diamond necklace symbolized what she believed was missing from her life, driving her to make decisions that ultimately led to her downfall.
Why do you think did mathilde loisel act and think the way she did as far as her status in life was concerned?
Mathilde Loisel acted and thought the way she did due to her dissatisfaction with her social status and material possessions. She was unhappy with her simple life and yearned for a more lavish and luxurious lifestyle. This discontentment drove her to make decisions that ultimately led to her downfall in "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant.
What are monsieur loisel's thoughts in The Necklace?
In "The Necklace," Monsieur Loisel is frustrated with his wife's dissatisfaction with their modest life and her desire for wealth and luxuries. He is practical and content with their life, which causes tension between them when Madame Loisel loses the borrowed necklace. He is patient and supportive in helping his wife find a way to replace the lost necklace.
Why did mathilde marry monsier loisel even if she felt that she was marring beneth her?
Mathilde married Monsieur Loisel because he was a clerk and had a stable job. Despite feeling like she was marrying beneath her social status, she valued financial security and comfort over love or personal fulfillment. She believed Monsieur Loisel could provide her with the lifestyle she desired.
Who are the major characters in the necklace by guy de maupassant?
mathilde and loisel
Who are the characters in the Necklace by Guy de Maupassant?
There are three characters in The Necklace. Monsieur Loisel and his wife Mathilde, and Mathilde's wealthy friend Madame Forestier.
Put the following events of the lives of Mathilde and Loisel in order beginning with the earliest?
We learn that Mathilde loves clothes and jewels more than anything.Invited to a party but with nothing to wear, Mathilde gets her husband to buy her a new dress and borrows a necklace from a friend.Mathilde loses the necklace.Mathilde and her husband buy a new necklace and work for years to get out of debt after doing so.Mathilde runs into the friend, who does not even recognize her.
Who are the dynamic and static characters in The Necklace?
In "The Necklace," Mathilde Loisel is a dynamic character as she undergoes a significant change in perspective and character development throughout the story. Her husband, Monsieur Loisel, is more of a static character, maintaining a consistent personality and behavior without significant evolution.
Who are the characters in 'The Necklace'?
Mr. and Mrs. Loisel, Mme Forestier ( owner of the necklace, who loans it out for Mme Loisel"s one night stand) miscellanous walk-on characters, people at the party, cab driver, etc. at no time did she have the common sense of calling up her friend and simply recounting everything that happened- which would have avoided much ( toil and trouble, not to mention money loss) The basic premise of a lost article figures in such social commentary tales as The Overcoat ( all of the money was Confederate), and watered down or turnabout plots, such as the (Super Car) a Detroit Dream car that figured in a plot in Bewitched and thanks to some Magic, was resolved happily- the car was returned to the Detroit custom shop where it was made, and the advertising executive ( who was driving the car when transmuted back to Detroit- seized on the idea of using it as an advertising prop ( he was selling sausages) it came out well, unlike the Necklace tale. listen folks- Observe and Heed article Nine from the Guy Upstairs....
How does don trine act at the end of the book the necklace?
In "The Necklace," Mathilde Loisel learns that the expensive necklace she borrowed was actually a fake. Don Trine acts with grace and forgiveness, offering to help Mathilde replace it by suggesting she visits a friend who has the means to purchase a similar necklace. His act of kindness contrasts with Mathilde's own actions throughout the story.
How does madame loisel lose the necklace?
When Mathilde finds out that she has lost the diamond necklace of Madame Forestier, she is in a depression. Mathilde and Monsieur Loisel then have to work for 10 years to come up with the 36,000 francs to buy a new necklace. She works as a maid to save the money and her husband does work two jobs..
Who are the flat and round characters in the story The Necklace?
In the story "The Necklace," Mathilde Loisel is a round character as she undergoes significant internal transformation. Her husband, Monsieur Loisel, is considered a flat character as he remains relatively unchanged and one-dimensional throughout the story.
Who is the foil character in 'The Necklace'?
The foil character in "The Necklace" is Madame Forestier, who contrasts with Mathilde Loisel by representing wealth, contentment, and stability. Madame Forestier's life serves as a stark contrast to Mathilde's desires and materialistic perspectives.
How does Guy de Maupassant use characterization in the necklace?
Madame Mathilde Loisel has a desire to be part of the upper class which sets the story's events in motion. She beliefs that she is meant for a life of upper class level. Madame Jeanne Forestier is the school friend of Mathilde Loisel, who lends her the necklace that Madame Loisel wears to the ball. Monsieur Loisel is Madame Mathilde Loisel's husband who tries to please her by buying expensive jewelry and clothes just to satisfy her content.
What are some questions on the story 'The Necklace'?
How does Mathilde Loisel's desire for wealth and social status affect her life? What role does the necklace play in the story's plot? How does the theme of deception and appearance versus reality manifest in the story? What is the significance of the story's ending and the revelation about the necklace?
Who is the owner of the necklace in the necklace?
MMe Forestier. It is a counterfeit wearing copy. She smugly does not inform social-climbing Mme Loisel ( la-zell it was pronounced when I had this in English) that it is a wearing copy. she loses it at the ball- exactly how is not stated- a phone call could have saved about sixty grand and a nose-dive into debt slavery and relative poverty.
