The cherry-picking fallacy occurs when someone selectively chooses evidence that supports their argument while ignoring contradictory evidence. For example, a person might only present positive reviews of a product while ignoring negative reviews, or only highlight data that supports their viewpoint while disregarding conflicting data.
The sentimental appeal fallacy occurs when emotions are used to manipulate or persuade rather than logical reasoning. Examples include using pity to win an argument, appealing to nostalgia to justify a position, or relying on fear to sway opinions.
The burden of proof fallacy occurs when someone makes a claim and expects others to disprove it, rather than providing evidence to support their claim. Examples include saying a product is effective because there's no evidence it's not, or claiming a conspiracy theory is true unless someone can prove it wrong.
The sentimental appeals fallacy involves using emotions to persuade rather than logic. Examples include using pity, fear, or guilt to sway someone's opinion, rather than presenting factual evidence or reasoning.
Some examples of arguments that commonly occur in real life include disagreements over politics, religion, relationships, money, and personal beliefs. These arguments can arise between friends, family members, coworkers, and even strangers.
Examples of the ignoring the question fallacy include changing the subject when someone asks a difficult question, providing irrelevant information in response to a specific inquiry, or deflecting attention away from the original topic by giving unrelated answers.
The sentimental appeal fallacy occurs when emotions are used to manipulate or persuade rather than logical reasoning. Examples include using pity to win an argument, appealing to nostalgia to justify a position, or relying on fear to sway opinions.
The burden of proof fallacy occurs when someone makes a claim and expects others to disprove it, rather than providing evidence to support their claim. Examples include saying a product is effective because there's no evidence it's not, or claiming a conspiracy theory is true unless someone can prove it wrong.
Snow white and the seven dwarfs
The Ruined Maid by Thomas Hardy for one.
There are many, and they are fascinating. Start with the link below. This is not necessarily an exhaustive list. Some fallacious arguments are subtle and strong, and it can take some effort to see through them. The 'false dilemma' fallacy at the link is particularly interesting. Sometimes for the sake of simplicity examples of fallacies are brought down to terms that are so simple it is hard to see them 'in action' in real-life arguments. For examples, see "An example of false dilemma?" link below.
The sentimental appeals fallacy involves using emotions to persuade rather than logic. Examples include using pity, fear, or guilt to sway someone's opinion, rather than presenting factual evidence or reasoning.
Some examples of arguments that commonly occur in real life include disagreements over politics, religion, relationships, money, and personal beliefs. These arguments can arise between friends, family members, coworkers, and even strangers.
Examples of the ignoring the question fallacy include changing the subject when someone asks a difficult question, providing irrelevant information in response to a specific inquiry, or deflecting attention away from the original topic by giving unrelated answers.
The fallacy of perfection in everyday life is when people believe that things must be flawless or perfect to be acceptable. Examples include expecting a perfect relationship, flawless appearance, or flawless performance at work. This unrealistic expectation can lead to dissatisfaction and stress.
This would be like evading the question. A fallacy is delusion, deception, and deceit. Some other examples would be omit, evade, disregard, reject, neglect, overlook, and disdain.
This would be like evading the question. A fallacy is delusion, deception, and deceit. Some other examples would be omit, evade, disregard, reject, neglect, overlook, and disdain.
The ad populum fallacy occurs when an argument is based on the belief that something is true because many people believe it. Examples include "Everyone is doing it, so it must be right" or "If it's popular, it must be good." This fallacy can impact the validity of an argument by relying on popularity rather than evidence or logic to support a claim, leading to a weak or flawed argument.