answersLogoWhite

0

Deductive and Inductive Arguments

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Philosophy

What is more common inductive argument or deductive argument?

Deductive arguments are more common than inductive arguments. Deductive reasoning begins with a general statement and applies it to a specific case, leading to a certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning begins with specific observations and generates a general hypothesis.


Can a inductive argument be changed into a deductive argument?

Sure, you count the apples in a basket, for example. Inductively, you found that there are five. Now, if you were to give an answer as to one of them being a part of a set of all the apples in a basket, you would have to say that it is a part of a set consisting of five apples.


How do you formulate a deductive or inductive argument?

Deductive reasoning is reasoning that starts with general principles to form a conclusion about a specific case. To formulate a deductive argument, you should take a general idea or concept, like an ideology or commonly shared moral view and relate it to a more specific subject that links to your side of the argument. Inductive reasoning is the exact opposite; it involves developing a set of specific facts to create a general principle. To formulate an inductive argument, you should take a set of related facts and link them to an overarching moral or concept that supports your argument.


Can a valid deductive argument have a false conclusion?

No, a valid deductive argument cannot have a false conclusion. If the argument is valid, it means that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the conclusion is false, it means that the argument is not valid.


An argument in which the author presents a general conclusion before listing observed specifics is what type of argument?

An argument in which the author presents a general conclusion before listing observed specifics is an inductive argument. Inductive reasoning involves moving from specific observations to broader generalizations or conclusions.

Related Questions

How is inductive reasoning different from deductive reasoning?

Inductive reasoning varies from deductive reasoning as follows: 1) inductive reasoning is a reason supporting an argument and 2) deductive reasoning is an argument against an argument.


What are the 4 fundamentals of logic?

Argument Deductive argument Inductive Argument Analogy


What is more common inductive argument or deductive argument?

Deductive arguments are more common than inductive arguments. Deductive reasoning begins with a general statement and applies it to a specific case, leading to a certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning begins with specific observations and generates a general hypothesis.


An argument that starts from a more specific idea to reach a more general conclusion is known as?

inductive-reasoning


Which law allows you to state a conclusion from two true conditional statements?

Syllogism, logic (deductive or inductive).Syllogism, logic (deductive or inductive).Syllogism, logic (deductive or inductive).Syllogism, logic (deductive or inductive).


What are inductive and deductive reasoning?

the answer between the two:)deductive: means something...no questions about itinductive: questionable


Can a inductive argument be changed into a deductive argument?

Sure, you count the apples in a basket, for example. Inductively, you found that there are five. Now, if you were to give an answer as to one of them being a part of a set of all the apples in a basket, you would have to say that it is a part of a set consisting of five apples.


which is most important inductive or deductive reasoning?

which is the most important inductive or deductive reasoning


How do you formulate a deductive or inductive argument?

Deductive reasoning is reasoning that starts with general principles to form a conclusion about a specific case. To formulate a deductive argument, you should take a general idea or concept, like an ideology or commonly shared moral view and relate it to a more specific subject that links to your side of the argument. Inductive reasoning is the exact opposite; it involves developing a set of specific facts to create a general principle. To formulate an inductive argument, you should take a set of related facts and link them to an overarching moral or concept that supports your argument.


Can a valid deductive argument have a false conclusion?

No, a valid deductive argument cannot have a false conclusion. If the argument is valid, it means that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the conclusion is false, it means that the argument is not valid.


Is this phrase inductive or deductive Ignorance is the greatest cause of hatred and disorder in the world The best way to combat ignorance is through the dissemination of valid and accurate inform?

It is an inductive argument


An argument in which the author presents a general conclusion before listing observed specifics is what type of argument?

An argument in which the author presents a general conclusion before listing observed specifics is an inductive argument. Inductive reasoning involves moving from specific observations to broader generalizations or conclusions.