The caused of lack of trust between Athens and Sparta were suspicion. As Athenian empire became rich and powerful, other city-states such as Sparta grew suspicious of it aim. Led by Sparta, they start join forces against Athens.
This is such a philosophical question! It is true that although opposites, "trust" and "doubt" complement each other. From doubt, we learn what and who to trust. From trust, we learn what and who to doubt. To trust yet to also doubt is a third category compared to "to trust" or "to doubt". In fact, there are few situations in which we completely "trust" or in which we completely "doubt". Instead, we are usually riding a continuim between trust and doubt during most interactions and experiences. From experience, both positive and negative, we learn to challege what we doubt, as well as challenge what we trust. However, humans find it harder to challenge things they've already decided are trustworthy, unless some betrayal of that trust occurs. For example, we come to trust a certain brand of product tastes good. We might strongly disagree with someone who says that brand tastes bad, and we might place the negative comments under some qualifying info, like, "people's taste buds are different". But then, one time we experience that the product we trust does indeed taste horrible! Rationally, you know the problem may have been in that one isolated package. Yet, when you reach for it the next time in the store, you withdraw your hand, remembering how horrible it was last time. You have lost your trust in that brand. Some people would say we must challenge our doubts and learn to trust. But every day, we choose and decide based in part on doubts. "Will Cake Mix A taste better than Cake Mix B?" "Will the girl I like also like me?" "Does the teacher like me?" Doubts shape how we behave, whether well or poorly. Doubts we know; we can list them easily to justify how we think, talk, act, plan, etc. What we trust, though, we unconsciously realize can change in one moment, through one betrayal. So if our doubts are more conscious, as things we can list quite vocally, wouldn't it be more important to "dare to challenge" what we trust and consciously know why we give it our trust? Why do you trust one friend over another one? Why do you trust one teacher more than another teacher? Why do you trust one restuarant more than one closer to your house? Why do you trust your brand of shampoo? The water you drink? The food you eat? Note that trust is not "like versus dislike". Trust involves much more than "like". Trust implies a committment between "me" and "the other person" or me and a brand or between me and something I value. Trust implies, to varying degrees, that "I know you (whether "you" is a friend or is a product). Trust implies, in some way, that I have given what I trust some power over me, whether the power is to influence or to love or to buy. If I trust Brand A of Frozen peas, in my trust I give the brand power so that I buy it over and over again. If the trust I give involves influence, like with a teacher, I have subconsciously said "yes" to learning from that teacher through influence and instruction. If it involves love, I have given trust to another person to love me back and to not deliberately hurt me. But often what we trust is unknown and why we trust is unknown---even if we think we know why we trust. So since I can rattle off all the reasons "I doubt" something or someone, I would dare myself to challenge what "I trust", simply to really know why I have given my trust to a particular person or thing.
Faith is a strong trust or confidence in something, often without proof. Belief is accepting something as true or real based on evidence or reasoning. Faith is more about trust and conviction, while belief is more about acceptance of a concept or idea.
Trust and truth are connected because trust is built upon honesty and transparency, which are traits associated with truth. When we are truthful in our interactions with others, it helps to establish trust and credibility in our relationships. Without truth, it is difficult to build or maintain trust.
A theme statement for trust could be: "Trust is fragile yet essential for meaningful relationships and personal growth."
A good thesis statement for trust could be: "Trust is the foundation of healthy relationships, enabling individuals to feel secure, valued, and understood. Through communication, reliability, and vulnerability, trust can be nurtured and strengthened, leading to deeper connections and mutual growth."
The lack of trust between Sparta and Athens stemmed primarily from their contrasting political systems and cultural values. Athens embraced democracy and naval power, while Sparta was a militaristic oligarchy focused on land-based dominance. Their rivalry intensified during the Peloponnesian War, where both city-states sought to expand their influence, leading to deep-seated suspicion and animosity. Additionally, past conflicts and alliances further fueled their distrust, solidifying the divide between the two prominent Greek city-states.
Athens sent troops to help Sparta put down a revolt by their serfs. The Athenians started to show signs of favouring the serfs, so the Spartans sent them home, with lasting resentment on both sides.
For a long period they were allies. Then after Athens established an empire after the Persian Wars, it became intrusive of other city-states and the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta tried to limit this.
In about 460 BCE, after the Persian invasion had been repelled by the combined Greek forces, Sparta was facing a revolt by its serf population in Messene, and making heavy weather in putting it down. Athens offered to help and sent an expeditionary force to reinforce the Spartan forces. The Athenians were very adventurous in their operations, and showed up Spartan methods, which was based on trying to force a pitched battle with an elusive opposition which declined to make itself such a target. There is also a suggestion thet the Athenians showed some sympathy for the Messenians. The upshot was that Sparta invited the Athenians to go home, and the usual cooperative spirit between the two cities soured. After peace was finally made with the Persians in 449 BCE, Athens converted the anti-Persian Delian League which it led into an empire of its own, continuing to levy the war fund from the 200 cities of that league to use for its own benefit and maintaining a strong navy to enforce the annual collection of money. With this strength, Athens aggressively interfered in the affairs of the cities to which Sparta was allied in the Peloponnesian League, particularly Corinth. The Peloponnesian League members urged Sparta to help them stand up to Athens. A cocksure Athens persisted in interfering in other cities, and this came to a head when Athens banned Megara, a Peloponnesian League member, from trade with cities in its empire, which would destroy Megara. The Peloponnesian League demanded Sparta act, Sparta demanded Athens back off, Athens refused, war ensued.
Form a Shortcut Trust. They are configured manually between domains to bypass the normal referral process.
What is the difference between credit shelter trust and irrevocable trust?
alexander the great and he was from the athens i know this trust me
mistrust is you cant trust someone and trust is well you trust someone
Mutual trust between lovers and friends is when both parties trust the other an equal amount.
He loaded a shell into the breech of the cannon and waited for the order to fire.The company has caused a BREACH of trust by dismissing a worker.The company has caused a breech of trust by dismissing a worker.
it is caused by when the moon passes the sun directly i think just warning you dont trust me
Friction between individuals in a team setting can be caused by differences in communication styles, conflicting personalities, varying work ethics, lack of trust, and competition for leadership roles.