A person involved in an argument can be called a participant or a disputant.
valid
The subject of an argument is the topic or issue being discussed or debated. It represents the main point of contention between the parties involved in the argument.
Valid. A deductive argument is considered valid when it follows the correct form of logic, even if the premises are not true. This means that if the premises of a valid deductive argument are true, then the conclusion must also be true.
Using "lie of omission" quotes in a conversation or argument can lead to misunderstandings, misrepresentation of facts, and a lack of trust between the parties involved. It can also weaken the credibility of the person using such quotes and damage the overall integrity of the discussion.
No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.
Fighting, arguing, bickering....
An angry dispute or argument is often referred to as a "quarrel" or "altercation." It can also be called a "contentious debate" or "heated argument," highlighting the intensity of emotions involved. Such confrontations typically arise from differing opinions or conflicts.
A group of lawyers is called an argument.
valid
The subject of an argument is the topic or issue being discussed or debated. It represents the main point of contention between the parties involved in the argument.
three
article A+
In call by value, the value of the argument is passed to the function, while in call by name, the expression for the argument is passed and evaluated each time it is used in the function.
That is called passing an argument by value.
A consensus.
Dont get involved it only makes it worse
We're not getting involved in your argument.