answersLogoWhite

0

The answer is simple, you would use he said she said

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is critical thinking bad for politic?

Critical thinking is not inherently bad for politics. In fact, critical thinking can help individuals analyze political issues, evaluate arguments, and make informed decisions. However, the way critical thinking is used in politics can vary, and individuals may have different perspectives and biases that influence their critical thinking process.


What does evaluate mean in critical thinking?

In critical thinking, to evaluate means to assess, judge, or determine the value or worth of something based on evidence or criteria. It involves analyzing information, arguments, or ideas in order to form a reasoned judgment or decision.


Who said critical thinking requires arguments?

Philosopher Bertrand Russell emphasized the importance of critical thinking in analyzing arguments. He wrote that to engage in critical thinking, one must be able to evaluate arguments objectively and assess their validity and soundness.


How can you use critical thinking in a sentence?

I'll need to apply my estimable critical thinking skills in order to solve this enigma.


Which term refers to the ability to think clearly evaluate information and reason logically?

Analyze critical thinking


What does the acronym SEEi stand for when it comes to critical thinking?

SEEi stands for State, Elaborate, Exemplify, and Illustrate. It is a method used in critical thinking to help individuals thoroughly examine and evaluate their thoughts and ideas.


The central element in the process of critical thinking is?

The central element in the process of critical thinking is the ability to analyze information, evaluate evidence, and make reasoned judgments or decisions. Critical thinking involves questioning assumptions, considering multiple perspectives, and being open to new ideas or viewpoints.


How would you define critical thinking?

Critical thinking is the ability to objectively analyze and evaluate information to form well-considered judgments or decisions. It involves being open-minded, skeptical, and willing to question assumptions. Critical thinkers are adept at reasoning, problem-solving, and forming sound arguments.


What hallmark of critical thinking?

One hallmark of critical thinking is the ability to analyze information objectively, using reasoning and evidence to arrive at logical conclusions. Critical thinkers also demonstrate the willingness to consider different perspectives and to continually evaluate and refine their thinking based on new information or evidence.


How does philosophy relate to critical thinking?

Philosophy and critical thinking are closely related in that philosophy often encourages critical thinking by questioning assumptions, analyzing arguments, and constructing logical reasoning. Critical thinking is a key skill in philosophy, as it enables individuals to evaluate information and arguments in a systematic and rational way, helping them arrive at well-reasoned conclusions. In essence, philosophy nurtures and refines critical thinking skills by teaching individuals to approach problems and ideas with a critical mindset.


How is critical thinking and information literacy related?

Critical thinking and information literacy are closely related in that they both involve the ability to evaluate and analyze information effectively. Information literacy provides the skills to locate, evaluate, and use information, while critical thinking enables individuals to assess the credibility, relevance, and value of that information. Together, they help individuals make well-informed decisions and judgments based on evidence and reasoning.


How does egocentrism interfere with critical thinking?

Egocentrism can interfere with critical thinking by causing individuals to prioritize their own perspectives, leading to a lack of openness to new ideas or perspectives. This can hinder the ability to consider alternative viewpoints or evaluate evidence objectively, ultimately limiting the depth and accuracy of critical thinking processes.