0
What does it mean to reason from what is fact instead of from what is morally right?
To reason from what is fact means to base decisions and conclusions on concrete evidence, data, and logic, without considering moral values or principles. This approach prioritizes objective truths and empirical observations over ethical considerations. It may lead to decisions that are pragmatic and based on practicality rather than on moral principles.
What else can I help you with?
Kant's Doctrine of the Fact of Reason?
Kant's Doctrine of the Fact of Reason asserts that there are moral principles inherently embedded in human reason, such as the existence of free will and the moral obligation to follow the categorical imperative. These principles are not based on empirical evidence but are necessary for the functioning of practical reason and the belief in moral values. Kant argues that the fact of reason serves as the foundation for moral autonomy and grounds the possibility of moral duties.
Can you provide an example of a brute fact and explain how it differs from other types of facts?
A brute fact is a fact that exists without any explanation or deeper reason behind it. For example, the fact that the sky is blue is a brute fact because it is simply the way things are without a further explanation. This differs from other types of facts, such as scientific facts, which are based on evidence and reasoning to explain why things are the way they are.
What is a brute fact and how does it differ from other types of facts?
A brute fact is a fact that is true without any explanation or deeper reason behind it. It differs from other types of facts because it does not rely on any underlying principles or causes to be true. Brute facts are simply accepted as they are, without further justification.
Does Descartes show we aren't dreaming?
Descartes' philosophy on reality actually shows that we cannot for sure know that we aren' dreaming. In fact, Descartes believed that we are not sure of anything, except for the fact that we exist because we use logic and reason. Sorry that this doesn't answer your question, but the point of this ideology is for others to try to show Descartes how we know FOR CERTAIN that we are not dreaming right now....harder to do than one would think.
What could you say instead of yes?
indeed; of course; by all means; certainly; no doubt; right away; I agree; that is true; bingo! Remember that yes can mean different things. It can be the simple answer to a question of fact. "Are you comfortable?" "Yes." Yes can also be a response to a request. "Would you pick up some milk on your way home?" "Yes." Not all alternatives work with every use. If you asked "Is the water very cold?" you would not expect an answer of "Right away." Or: "Was it where you expected?" "I agree."
Can a company fire you after they find out you are a felon?
It may not be the fact that you are a felon but the fact that you may not have told them and deliberately deceived them then yes they would have a right to let you go then. Employers do not need a "right" to fire for a particular reason. US law is clear - employers can fire you for good reason or no reason. The employer can ignore your felony or fire you for it or no particular reason, and need not explain themselves to you.
How does reason play into people's view of rights?
I'm going to assume that by "reason" you mean a rational ground, motive or explanation or logical defense that supports a conclusion or explains a fact or coinsurance; or the rational that makes some fact intelligible. Reason can be a slippery item, since people will often invent a rational to support their conclusions. For example, look at the classic examples of "reason" for racial discrimination. Last, "rights" can also be a slippery concept. "Rights" can be anything the opinionated person states are "their right." Again, as an example, look to the facetious "right" to own slaves. So, reason can be a principled rational asserting a right (or undercutting a perceived right), a construct to justify a closely held belief (thus putting the cart before the horse), or a justification establishing a "right" to which no right previously existed (creating a right out of thin air). In any event, "reason" defends or explains peoples' belief in the existence (or nonexistence) of a right, or is a rational to create a new right. Reason is not always reasonable!
Is test tube cloning right or wrong?
In many respects it is morally neutral. From one point of view, it is simply the creation of another life or the imitation of, something that happens on a regular basis naturally. In fact, the act of procreation itself is morally neutral. Imitation of a natural phenomena is hardly unethical either, else many buildings (dams) and technologies (web [internet]) would be morally wrong. Many religions find the concept abhorrent due to the idea that cloning is encroaching upon the territory of their deity. Cloning itself is a tool, a process and as such has no moral leaning. It can be 'right' or 'wrong'.
Why is it another naughty thing to scream at someone when they tell you not to put germs in food?
Because they can only think about how loud it is instead of them the fact that they're right?
Who had the right to use native Americans as slaves?
Ethically and morally, no one did.Until laws were enacted to prohibit slavery anyone, with the power and resources to do so, could and did, enslave anyone they chose.Slavery has been a fact of life throughout history and it still exists TO THIS DAY
How do you write an accordion paragraph?
Topic Sentence * 1st Supporting detail/reason/fact * Explain * Explain * 2nd Supporting detail/reason/fact * Explain * Explain * 3rd Supporting detail/reason/fact * Explain * Explain Conclusion
Why shoudn't you put a car 350 in your truck?
there is no reason you cannot put a car 350 in your truck, in fact any small block V8 will bolt right in.
How do you explain the fact that morally evil people can bwe highly educated in terms of ethics and religion?
They can just simply become well informed about these topics but just choose to live their life he way they choose and not how others would like them to even though most may find it morally wrong.
Were we morally permitted to drop the atomic bombs?
It would be like any other bomb dropped over a city. The fact that it was nuclear always brings these questions to everyone.
Kant's Doctrine of the Fact of Reason?
Kant's Doctrine of the Fact of Reason asserts that there are moral principles inherently embedded in human reason, such as the existence of free will and the moral obligation to follow the categorical imperative. These principles are not based on empirical evidence but are necessary for the functioning of practical reason and the belief in moral values. Kant argues that the fact of reason serves as the foundation for moral autonomy and grounds the possibility of moral duties.
Are teachers always right?
n No, teachers are not always right. They are normally right, ecpeccially if they are reading out of a text book :) nope nope they are not always right unless it it is fact to fact! :P
Is it an fact or opinion that instead to keep the stamps clean collectors use stamp tongs to pick up stamps?
Fact
