1. Everything has a functionthat it alone can do or that ir does better than anything else (ergon)
2. The virtue/ experience of a thing is that property that enables it to perform its function well (arete)
3.The function of the soul is living
4.From (2) and (3), the virtue of the soul is whatever enables it to perform its function well.
5. Justice is the virtue of the soul
6. Therefore from (5) and (6), a just person will live well and an unjust person will live badly
7. Therefore a just person is happy
An example of a valid argument is: "All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal." This argument is valid because the conclusion logically follows from the premises.
An example of a sound argument would be: "All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal." This argument is sound because it is valid (the conclusion logically follows from the premises) and the premises are true.
All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
The argument is logically flawed. While it is true that all men are mortal and Socrates was mortal, it does not follow that all men are Socrates. This conclusion is incorrect.
Socrates used his method of questioning to undermine Crito's arguments and challenge his assumptions. Socrates employed logic and reason to expose inconsistencies in Crito's reasoning, making it difficult for Crito to maintain control of the argument. Additionally, Socrates' conviction and commitment to his beliefs made it challenging for Crito to sway him to a different perspective.
An example of a valid argument is: "All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal." This argument is valid because the conclusion logically follows from the premises.
An example of a sound argument would be: "All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal." This argument is sound because it is valid (the conclusion logically follows from the premises) and the premises are true.
All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
Crito says to do what people think is right, but Socrates says you must do what you think is right
By responding in unexpected ways
Crito says to do what people think is right, but Socrates says you must do what you think is right.
crito says to do what people think is right,but socrates says you must do what you think is right
relying on logic.
The argument is logically flawed. While it is true that all men are mortal and Socrates was mortal, it does not follow that all men are Socrates. This conclusion is incorrect.
Socrates used his method of questioning to undermine Crito's arguments and challenge his assumptions. Socrates employed logic and reason to expose inconsistencies in Crito's reasoning, making it difficult for Crito to maintain control of the argument. Additionally, Socrates' conviction and commitment to his beliefs made it challenging for Crito to sway him to a different perspective.
Socrates' unexpected response to the argument shows his commitment to following moral principles rather than fleeing from unjust punishment. Crito must now decide if he should respect Socrates' decision to accept his fate or try to help him escape.
Elenchus. It's another word for the Socratic Method of argument through questions.