0
What else can I help you with?
What is an offensive argument?
An offensive argument is one that is likely to cause harm, disrespect, or provoke strong negative emotions in the recipient. This can include personal attacks, discriminatory language, or targeting sensitive topics without sensitivity or consideration.
What is the name for the thesis or personal stance on an argument?
The name for the thesis or personal stance on an argument is the claim. It is the main point the writer or speaker is trying to prove or persuade others to accept.
What is an informal argument?
an argument with information
What form of argument is considered more intimate and less formal?
Anecdotal argument is more intimate and less formal compared to logical or empirical argument. It relies on personal experiences, stories, or examples to make a point, connecting with the audience on a more emotional level. It is often used in casual conversations or personal narratives.
What is the discernibility argument?
The discernibility argument is an argument used in philosophy, especially in theories of identity. It posits that if two objects are truly identical in all respects, then they cannot be thought of as distinct entities—there must be some discernible feature that sets them apart. This argument is often applied to questions of personal identity and the nature of objects.
What is an example of speech that would be restricted?
In a personal argument the use of obscenity.
What is an offensive argument?
An offensive argument is one that is likely to cause harm, disrespect, or provoke strong negative emotions in the recipient. This can include personal attacks, discriminatory language, or targeting sensitive topics without sensitivity or consideration.
What is the name for the thesis or personal stance on an argument?
The name for the thesis or personal stance on an argument is the claim. It is the main point the writer or speaker is trying to prove or persuade others to accept.
Can you use "I" in argumentative essays to present a personal perspective and strengthen your argument?
Yes, using "I" in argumentative essays can be effective in presenting a personal perspective and strengthening your argument by adding credibility and connecting with the reader on a more personal level.
What was George Washington's personal argument on freedom?
Because he is a drueuoosss
Which IT company sold off its Personal Computer division to a China-based company?
which it company sold off its personal computer division to a china based company
What is vaio?
Vaio is the Personal computer division of Sony.
How did religious differences lead to the division of India?
It was not religious differences responsible for the division of India. The personal ambitions of Jawahar Lal Nehru and Mohd. Ali Jinnah were responsible for the division. Gandhi never agreed for the division
What is an informal argument?
an argument with information
What form of argument is considered more intimate and less formal?
Anecdotal argument is more intimate and less formal compared to logical or empirical argument. It relies on personal experiences, stories, or examples to make a point, connecting with the audience on a more emotional level. It is often used in casual conversations or personal narratives.
Can you effectively use the word "I" in an argumentative essay to convey personal perspective and strengthen your argument?
Yes, using the word "I" in an argumentative essay can be effective in conveying personal perspective and strengthening your argument by providing a sense of authority and credibility to your opinions and experiences.
Argumentum ad hominem?
Argumentum ad hominem is a logical fallacy where an argument is rebutted by attacking the character or personal traits of the individual making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself. This tactic diverts attention from the issue at hand and undermines rational discourse. It often manifests in debates and discussions, where personal insults or irrelevant criticisms are used to discredit the opponent. Ultimately, it hinders constructive dialogue and does not contribute to a resolution of the actual argument.
