"Solid" in this case is a metaphor to indicate something that is reliable and won't easily fall apart, like a wall or other physical structure that is solid. So a solid argument is one that is convincing and which holds up well when examined critically. The opposite is a weak argument.
This type of argument is considered sound. It is both valid, meaning the conclusion logically follows from the premises, and all the premises are true, thus providing a solid foundation for the conclusion.
Yes, a logically flawed argument can still be persuasive because individuals can be persuaded by emotional appeals, misinformation, or manipulation of information even if the argument lacks solid reasoning or evidence. Persuasion does not always rely solely on valid logic.
Writers use logos in a persuasive argument to appeal to the audience's logical reasoning and credibility. By providing facts, statistics, and evidence, writers can make a strong, rational case to support their argument and convince the audience of its validity. Using logos helps build a solid foundation for the argument and enhances its overall persuasiveness.
A persuasive argument in philosophy is a well-structured and logically sound presentation of reasons and evidence to support a particular claim or position. It aims to convince the audience of the validity of the argument through logical reasoning, clear definitions, and solid premises. The effectiveness of a persuasive argument lies in its ability to address potential objections and counterarguments while presenting a compelling case for the position being advocated.
It is the process of backing up claims with evidence, examples, and logical reasoning to make the argument more convincing and solid. This can help to build a stronger case and persuade others to see your perspective or conclusion.
You need solid reasoning, evidence, and proof
Means stick to your argument without solid knowledge of what you are talking about
"Do me a solid" - "Do me a favor". "That's solid" - "That's neat", "That's cool".
This type of argument is considered sound. It is both valid, meaning the conclusion logically follows from the premises, and all the premises are true, thus providing a solid foundation for the conclusion.
Yes, a logically flawed argument can still be persuasive because individuals can be persuaded by emotional appeals, misinformation, or manipulation of information even if the argument lacks solid reasoning or evidence. Persuasion does not always rely solely on valid logic.
sound premises + strong facts + strong conclusion = effective solid argument
Writers use logos in a persuasive argument to appeal to the audience's logical reasoning and credibility. By providing facts, statistics, and evidence, writers can make a strong, rational case to support their argument and convince the audience of its validity. Using logos helps build a solid foundation for the argument and enhances its overall persuasiveness.
A persuasive argument in philosophy is a well-structured and logically sound presentation of reasons and evidence to support a particular claim or position. It aims to convince the audience of the validity of the argument through logical reasoning, clear definitions, and solid premises. The effectiveness of a persuasive argument lies in its ability to address potential objections and counterarguments while presenting a compelling case for the position being advocated.
A solid argument for breaking away from British
A counter argument is an argument made against another argument.
It means that in any argument, you have to pare down the main ideas and points into something easy to understand. By easily understanding the argument a person is more susceptible to thinking about it and to applying the basic parts to their own life.The idea behind the phrase is that an argument is intangible by nature and therefore difficult for people to perceive. By making it tangible, or concrete, people are able to easily see it, understand it, and contemplate it.
Generally speaking no. Some people say that glass is a liquid- that one always comes up as it has no real solid to liquid transition point. The argument is that if you leave it long enough it will spread, so it's a liquid. Its debatable though.