"I'm not really hungry" can imply that the person is actually hungry.
The opposite of "should be" is "should not be." "Should be" implies that something is expected or preferred, while "should not be" implies that something is not expected or preferred.
In the statement "p implies q," the relationship between p and q is that if p is true, then q must also be true.
The statement "p implies q" can be expressed as "not p or q" using the logical operator "or" and the negation of "p".
Unfortunately, you haven't included the statement for evaluation. Please provide the specific statement for a more accurate assessment.
Yes, the opposite of meaningful would be senseless. Meaningful conveys a sense of purpose or significance, while senseless implies a lack of logic or meaning.
Another name for an indirect proof is a proof by contradiction. In this method, the assumption of the opposite of what you want to prove is made, leading to a logical contradiction. This contradiction implies that the original statement must be true.
The opposite of "should be" is "should not be." "Should be" implies that something is expected or preferred, while "should not be" implies that something is not expected or preferred.
irony
It means the statement P implies Q.
The negation of a statement
A statement which has an opposite opinion to a theory
To prove by contradiction, you assume that an opposite assumption is true, then disprove the opposite statement.
It implies you have faith or a belief in god.
"Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." "An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field." "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth."
Another name for indirect proof is "proof by contradiction." In this method, the assumption is made that the statement to be proven is false, leading to a contradiction. This contradiction implies that the original statement must be true.
Protons and electrons have opposite charges. Neutrons, as the name implies, are neutral.
In the statement "p implies q," the relationship between p and q is that if p is true, then q must also be true.