a valid generalization is a word thats is hard to be proved wrong am only 12 btw
The most valid generalization about democracy is that it is a system of government based on the principle of majority rule while protecting the rights of minority groups and individuals. It allows for regular, free, and fair elections, as well as the protection of civil liberties and human rights.
An example of a valid argument is: "All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal." This argument is valid because the conclusion logically follows from the premises.
One example of a broad statement is "Exercise is good for your health." This statement does not specify a particular type of exercise or its specific benefits, making it a broad generalization.
A valid generalization is: B Women know many skills in many areas. True! Same can be said for men, too. These 2 are not valid generalizations: A Women know many housekeeping skills. Untrue. Many women know few housekeeping skills. Sometimes men know more housekeeping tips than the woman. C Women know many childrearing skills. Untrue. Just because women bear children, it does not make all women childrearing experts.
Yes, deductively sound arguments are also deductively valid. An argument is sound if and only if all of the premises are true (with respect to all cases of semantics) and the premises certainly prove the conclusion, which then must also be true. An example of a valid, but not sound argument: Everyone who lives on Mars is a martian I live on Mars Therefore I am a martian An example of a sound argument (which then must also be valid): All rodents are mammals A rat is a rodent Therefore a rat is a rodent Recall that semantics are important and must be considered for an argument to sound and valid. Consider the following example: Everyone from London is from England Person A is from London Therefore person A is from England For the sake of this example, assume person A is indeed from London. This still does not mean that this argument is sound, or even valid. There are many places named London that are not in England (eg. London, Ontario, Canada). Thus, the argument is not sound and is invalid.
A faulty generalization is a statement that's not true while a valid generalization is a true statement.
Everyone with red hair is a criminal. This is a blanket statement that has no basis in fact.
that they suck
See link
a true statement.a
a valid geneeralization is a not true statment
The valid generalization in the medicine bag is that some people don't like or get embarrassed when friends or family get involved with your routine or interact with your schedule.
*A generalization is a statement about several things or people *clue words to identify generalization * Valid generalization: fact support or prove and (true) generalization *clue words in a sentence to make a generalization: never,all,sometimes,most,always,none,everybody,everone,society,some,almost,only,empty *Faulty generalization: (not true) generalization (can not) be proven or supported with a fact.
The crusades increased trade between Europe and Asia.
Spread shining throughout Asia
Democratic governments protect basic civil liberties
Spread shining throughout Asia