0
Eurymachus tries to shift the blame onto Antinous, saying he was the ringleader of the suitors' disrespectful behavior towards Penelope and Telemachus. He also offers to repay Odysseus for any damages caused and tries to appeal to his sense of mercy and forgiveness. Ultimately, Eurymachus seeks to evade responsibility and save himself by placing the blame on someone else.
What else can I help you with?
How does eurymachus try to persuade Odysseus to spare him and the other suitors?
Eurymachus tries to shift the blame onto Antinous, claiming he was the mastermind behind the suitors' behavior. He begs for mercy and offers to compensate Odysseus for their wrongdoings. Eurymachus also tries to make amends by promising to repay all the wealth they have consumed during their time at Odysseus' house.
How does Eurymachus try to persuade Odysseus to spare the lives of suitors?
Eurymachus admits that the suitors were wrong but tries to blame all of the suitors' evils on Antinous, the worst of them. He also offers to have the suitors repay Odysseus for all of the food and damages, and also pay a fine of 20 oxen, while paying him silver and gold until he forgives them. Eurymachus is not successful.
How does eurymachus convince Odysseus from killing all the suitors?
Eurymachus tries to shift the blame onto the suitor Antinous, claiming that he was the mastermind behind their misdeeds. He also offers restitution by promising to repay whatever was consumed by the suitors and cover the damages. Eurymachus appeals to Odysseus' mercy and asks for forgiveness, hoping to avoid his wrath.
What is argument from outrage fallecy?
The argument from outrage fallacy is when someone's argument is based on stirring up emotions like anger or indignation rather than reason or evidence. This fallacy tries to manipulate someone's emotions to win an argument instead of engaging in a logical discussion.
What is a fallacy in which a claim or argument is rejected the basis of some unrelated fact about the person presenting the argument?
Ad Hominem fallacy - it occurs when an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself. This fallacy is committed when one tries to refute an argument by attacking the person's character, motive, or other attribute.
How does eurymachus try to persuade Odysseus to spare him and the other suitors?
Eurymachus tries to shift the blame onto Antinous, claiming he was the mastermind behind the suitors' behavior. He begs for mercy and offers to compensate Odysseus for their wrongdoings. Eurymachus also tries to make amends by promising to repay all the wealth they have consumed during their time at Odysseus' house.
What best describes Eurymachus?
a hero
How does Eurymachus try to persuade Odysseus to spare the lives of suitors?
Eurymachus admits that the suitors were wrong but tries to blame all of the suitors' evils on Antinous, the worst of them. He also offers to have the suitors repay Odysseus for all of the food and damages, and also pay a fine of 20 oxen, while paying him silver and gold until he forgives them. Eurymachus is not successful.
How does eurymachus convince Odysseus from killing all the suitors?
Eurymachus tries to shift the blame onto the suitor Antinous, claiming that he was the mastermind behind their misdeeds. He also offers restitution by promising to repay whatever was consumed by the suitors and cover the damages. Eurymachus appeals to Odysseus' mercy and asks for forgiveness, hoping to avoid his wrath.
How does eurymachus deceive Penelope?
Eurymachus deceives Penelope by pretending to be a kind suitor when in reality, he is only interested in gaining power and influence by marrying her. He lies to Penelope and the other suitors to manipulate them and tries to sabotage Odysseus' return in order to further his own agenda.
How is crossing examination similar in a debate and in a trial?
one side tries to find the weak parts of the opposing sides argument
A decesion that tries to satisfy both sides of an argument?
compromise
How is cross-examination similar in a debate and in a trial?
one side tries to find the weak parts of the opposing sides argument
If a prisoner tries to kill himself will the guard stop?
Yes, if a prisoner tries to kill himself a guard will stop him.
What is argument from outrage fallecy?
The argument from outrage fallacy is when someone's argument is based on stirring up emotions like anger or indignation rather than reason or evidence. This fallacy tries to manipulate someone's emotions to win an argument instead of engaging in a logical discussion.
What actors and actresses appeared in Jambareeqi Tries - 2013?
The cast of Jambareeqi Tries - 2013 includes: Kawari as herself Jambareeqi as Himself - Host Zephon Thompson as himself Zephon Thompson as Himself - Guest
What is argument from outrage?
The argument from outrage fallacy is when one tries to use loaded language and emotion to get people as angry as possible about an issue without giving a good reason to be angry.
