answersLogoWhite

0

Fallacy of opposition refers to the mistaken belief that just because two sides of an argument oppose each other, one must be right and the other wrong. This overlooks the possibility that both arguments could be flawed or that there can be a compromise or middle ground. It's important to critically evaluate each argument on its own merits rather than assuming one is correct based solely on its opposition.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the suffix of fallacy?

fallacy(period)


What part of speech is fallacy?

Fallacy is a noun.


Can anyone give an example of a fallacy?

A fallacy is a statement that is in error or not correct. "The earth is flat" is a fallacy.


A fallacy is basically an?

A fallacy is basically an error in reasoning.


What is fallacy of positive instances?

fallacy of positive instances


What is the difference between a formal fallacy and an informal fallacy?

A formal fallacy is a mistake in the logical structure of an argument, while an informal fallacy is an error in the content or context of the argument.


What is Ad hominem?

An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.


What is beginning with an is and deducing it to ought is what type of fallacy?

The naturalist fallacy.


Beginning with an is and deducing an ought is known as which fallacy?

naturalistic fallacy


When was The Rhapsodic Fallacy created?

The Rhapsodic Fallacy was created in 1984.


What are the three types of fallacies that structural linguists find in traditional grammar?

Its Semantic Fallacy, Logical Fallacy, and Normative Fallacy.


Example of an ad hominem logical fallacy?

An ad hominem logical fallacy is an insult of a person making a point. If someone was making a point, and a person in opposition to that point called them a name as opposed to responding to their evidence, that would be an ad hominem.

Trending Questions
How does the concept of "my mind is the internet" influence your understanding of continuity in various aspects of life? What is the dust theory and how does it explain the formation of celestial bodies in the universe? Which choice would help a speaker establish ethos? What is the best way to describe personal values? Constructivist theory of truth? What is the problem of induction and how does it relate to the keyword "salmon"? Are enlightenment ideas still used today? Why do some people believe that the behavior of lemmings, such as mass migrations and potential mass suicides, is a myth perpetuated by popular culture rather than a natural occurrence among these small rodents? What is the Conclusion to principles of insurance? Do the Catholics condone slavery? How did psyche sisters react when they went to visit her and saw all of her wealth? Why does Roland claim The pagans are wrong the Christians are right? Which is a major legacy of the enlightenment? What and the character trait of the officer in William Tell folktale? If the conclusion of an argument is exactly as probable as its negation given the premises of the argument the the argument is weak? To trust and doubt is not the same as to trust or doubt It is not optional to move from the doubt to the trust because both positions complement each other for which one must dare to challenge? Is Jose P Rizal is realistic or idealistic? Who is the mayor of Cebu City in the Philippines? Who was aristotie? Is bill gates ethical in business which level of moral development is he on?