0
This is a difficult question to answer as science is not based on logic. Fundamentally the basis of science is a certain number of assumptions, such as empiricism, which is the belief that knowledge about the physical world comes from using our senses. Philosophically empiricism has been at odds with rationalism for centuries with entire books written on the one side building up science and the other side tearing it down.
.
This is not to say that science has no reasoning involved in it. Generally speaking science relies on a form of inductive reasoning. That is to say that dropping a rock several times resulted in a similar result that the rock will always behave in that manner. Experts in logic and epistemology have criticized the use of induction in science for centuries.
.
The most recent destruction of an attempted logical foundation for science was the abandonment of logical positivism, which had been proposed as a cure for science's shortcomings back in the 1920s. Fundamentally logical positivism was often associated with verificationism, that is the claim that a statement is only meaningful if there is a finite procedure for conclusively determining its truth. Unfortunately for logical positivism, there is no finite procedure for conclusively determining the truth of logical positivism.
.
Currently science tries to avoid the logical problems that plague it using two methods: Popperian falsification or Bayesian statistics and both methods have their adherents. Generally speaking nowadays statistics is more common especially in medical research where the importance of reaching a 95 percent statistical confidence level is crucial for getting one's work published.
.
So basically the answer to this question is well beyond the ability of this website to answer. Interested persons should read up on the philosophy of science and/or inductive reasoning.
What else can I help you with?
What was significant about Aristotle's theory logic?
He said logic is the means by which we know anything, in other words clear thinking is right as opposed to believing in gods causing things.
What are the best books on the philosophy of science?
Some of the best books on the philosophy of science include "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" by Thomas Kuhn, "Science and Hypothesis" by Henri Poincar, and "The Logic of Scientific Discovery" by Karl Popper. These books explore the nature of scientific knowledge, the process of scientific discovery, and the criteria for evaluating scientific theories.
What are the best philosophy of science books available?
Some of the best philosophy of science books include "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" by Thomas Kuhn, "Science as a Process" by David Hull, and "The Logic of Scientific Discovery" by Karl Popper. These books explore the nature of scientific knowledge, the methods of scientific inquiry, and the philosophy behind scientific theories.
What are the best science philosophy books available?
Some of the best science philosophy books include "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" by Thomas Kuhn, "The Logic of Scientific Discovery" by Karl Popper, and "The Selfish Gene" by Richard Dawkins. These books explore the nature of scientific knowledge, the philosophy of science, and the implications of scientific discoveries on society.
What is the difference between an artistic and scientific approach to problem-solving?
An artistic approach to problem-solving often involves creativity, intuition, and subjective interpretation, while a scientific approach relies on logic, evidence, and systematic analysis.
Who was the founder of scientific logic?
Aristottle is the founder of scientific logic.
When was The Logic of Scientific Discovery created?
The Logic of Scientific Discovery was created in 1934.
What did the scientific revolution emphasize?
Reason and Logic.
What is the difference between the natural logic and the scientific logic?
Natural logic refers to the everyday reasoning that humans use based on intuition and common sense, while scientific logic refers to the systematic and evidence-based approach used in scientific inquiry to analyze and understand the natural world. Scientific logic involves the use of empirical data, observation, experimentation, and logical reasoning to draw conclusions and make predictions, whereas natural logic relies more on personal experiences and beliefs.
What scientific word begins with the letter l?
logic
What is the logic behind the scientific notation?
sei la
Which of the four words is not a characteristic of scientific method logic imagination bias evidence?
Imagination is not a characteristic of the scientific method. The scientific method relies on logic, evidence, and minimizing bias to form conclusions based on empirical observations and experimentation.
Is Death reversible or irreversible?
death is reversible ?why? give scientific logic?
What has the author Gregory Dexter Walcott written?
Gregory Dexter Walcott has written: 'An elementary logic' -- subject(s): Logic 'Logic and scientific method' -- subject(s): Logic 'Research and statistics' -- subject(s): Academic Degrees
What is the difference between logic and science?
I would say logic is a prerequisite for science. In other words science is specific application of logic, not something completely separate. Logic presents the next stage in the scientific process or thinking. So every logical thing can only be logical if its approved by a scientific method; (theory, hypothesis, e.t.c). One leads to another.
Why do we have to learn scientific logic?
I can't, for the life of me, think of a good reason. I'm sure all our technologies, medicines, etc. would work so much better if people made up some fanciful explanation for things, made all our machines run on imagination, and cured illnesses with wishful thinking. And, BTW, what is 'scientific logic'? I've heard of Logic, non-Aristotelian Logic, Boolean Algebra, and the Scientific Method, but you've caught me out on this one.
What are cattel used for?
a student's ability to solve the logic puzzles in Scientific American magazine
