Hobbes describes a social contract where individuals give up some freedoms to a central authority in exchange for protection and security. This agreement forms the basis of a stable society where the government's role is to maintain order and prevent individuals from harming each other.
Hobbes believed that people were inherently evil, while Locke argued people were born as blank slates.
The main difference between the political philosophies of Hobbes and Locke is their views on the role of government. Hobbes believed in a strong, centralized government to maintain order and protect people from their own selfishness. Locke, on the other hand, believed in a limited government that protects individual rights and can be overthrown if it fails to do so.
Hobbes was more in favor of monarchy.right answer: They had different ideas about the meaning of the social contract.The differnce in ideas between Thomas Hobbes and john Locke can be best described as ideological because Hobbes thinks that mankind is 'self-interested' while Locke thinks that natural law presupposes that all humans are created equal and independent.
Thomas Hobbes believed in a strong central authority to maintain social order, while John Locke argued for limited government and individual rights. Hobbes believed people are naturally selfish and need a ruler to maintain peace, while Locke believed in the natural rights of life, liberty, and property.
Hobbes believe people exchange many personal freedoms for government protection
Hobbes believed that people were inherently evil, while Locke argued people were born as blank slates.
(Apex) Hobbes believed that people were naturally selfish and violent, while Locke did not.
The main difference between the political philosophies of Hobbes and Locke is their views on the role of government. Hobbes believed in a strong, centralized government to maintain order and protect people from their own selfishness. Locke, on the other hand, believed in a limited government that protects individual rights and can be overthrown if it fails to do so.
Hobbes was more in favor of monarchy.right answer: They had different ideas about the meaning of the social contract.The differnce in ideas between Thomas Hobbes and john Locke can be best described as ideological because Hobbes thinks that mankind is 'self-interested' while Locke thinks that natural law presupposes that all humans are created equal and independent.
Thomas Hobbes believed in a strong central authority to maintain social order, while John Locke argued for limited government and individual rights. Hobbes believed people are naturally selfish and need a ruler to maintain peace, while Locke believed in the natural rights of life, liberty, and property.
i think its government
Hobbes believe people exchange many personal freedoms for government protection
andrew
thomas hobbes
The idea that government is a contract between rulers and the people is most famously associated with the philosopher Thomas Hobbes. In his work "Leviathan," published in 1651, Hobbes describes the social contract as an agreement in which individuals consent to surrender some of their freedoms in exchange for protection and order provided by a sovereign authority. This concept was later expanded upon by other philosophers, such as John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who also emphasized the importance of the social contract in political theory.
Thomas Hobbes believed in a strong central authority to maintain social order and prevent chaos; he argued that people are inherently selfish and need control. John Locke, on the other hand, believed in natural rights and that government's role should be to protect those rights; he upheld the idea that individuals have the right to rebel against an oppressive government.
Hobbes believed in a strong, centralized government to maintain order and protect people from their own selfishness, while Locke believed in a more limited government that protects individual rights and can be overthrown if it fails to do so.