In terms of philosophy, that depends on the philosopher and his or her beliefs. It also probably depends on your beliefs. In general, something that agrees with your view of morality or moral law is moral, and anything outside that is immoral. In terms of religion, it also depends on your beliefs, but morality is usually ascribed to things that God considers right and good, and immoral things are things that God condemns. ... overall, we do share (all religions and non-religions) some basic moral values as a culture. For instance... killing another human being is generally condemned. Different cultures have different beliefs about many things, but there are commonalities around which we usually build laws and the structure of our societies.
ANSWER: The same difference between loving they neighbor and killing him. The same difference between respecting the property of others and stealing it. The same difference between living your life in the service in humanity and living your life enslaving humanity. It matters not who the philosopher is or what his beliefs and you can call murder moral all you want, it won't change the outcome. Truth isn't a matter of opinion where my truth is different from your truth. Truth is truth regardless of what is true for me and what is true for you. Murder isn't wrong because that's my world view, murder is wrong because it is anti-survival. Morality is behavior that supports survival and immorality is behavior that is anti-survival.
There is no difference between ethics and positive morality. The two of them are interrelated and have to be applied collectively. You cannot have ethics and lack positive morality and vice versa.
The key difference between act and rule utilitarianism is in how they determine the morality of actions. Act utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of each individual action to determine its morality, while rule utilitarianism looks at following general rules that lead to the greatest overall happiness.
Objective morality refers to moral rules or principles that are universal and independent of personal beliefs or opinions. Subjective morality, on the other hand, is based on personal feelings, beliefs, or opinions and can vary from one person to another. Objective morality tends to be fixed and unchanging, while subjective morality may be more flexible and open to interpretation.
Slave morality and master morality are two contrasting ethical systems proposed by philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. Slave morality is characterized by values such as humility, compassion, and meekness, which are typically associated with the oppressed or disadvantaged. In contrast, master morality is based on values like strength, power, and dominance, often embraced by those in positions of authority or privilege. The key distinction lies in the source of moral values and the perspective from which they are viewed.
Morality refers to personal beliefs about right and wrong behavior, often influenced by religion or culture. Ethics, on the other hand, are principles that guide behavior in a professional or societal context, often based on logic and reason.
Immorality has serious ,even deadly physical and spiritual consequences.
moral is something right or wrong morality is how long you live, we are all mortal because we all die someday
What is the difference between "morals" and "morality"? I think these are just two sides of the same moral phenomenon. Morals are the social side and morality is the individual side of the same. Morals mean for me the moral norms and moral principles of the common sense and/or accepted by the members of a social community. Morality means the personal moral values and principles which conduct really my behaviour.
"Not following your conscience" so that you commit a wrongful act may be described as "immorality". NOTE: Each person may define morality and immorality differently. Societies may describe these two differently, also.
Nietzsche described master Morality is some kind of honor, creator of values, art, nobility...while slave Morality is friendship, and compassion. Slave morality speaks against power believes it to a negative. For Nietzsche, master morality is detrimental to freedom.
There is no difference between ethics and positive morality. The two of them are interrelated and have to be applied collectively. You cannot have ethics and lack positive morality and vice versa.
both of them should be consistent with each other. Ethics are the laws which God gives to us and the morality is how we live these laws inour lives. There must not be a division between these.
Immorality can be lessened by inculcating the message of morality, international brotherhood, universal love among the masses especially among the students from their childhood. Messages from leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King should be incorporated in school text books.
The morality of a substance refers to the amount of ethical goodness or virtuous behavior it embodies. Twice the morality of a substance would imply that the substance has double the ethical value or virtuous characteristics compared to its original morality.
The two words mean basically the same. Ethics means motivation based on ideas of right and wrong. While morality means concern with the distinction between good and evil or right and wrong; right or good conduct.
Dorian Gray presents the ideas of corruption, the purpose of art, and guilt. It also explores the morality and immorality and the effect of each on the soul.
Morals define personal character, while ethics stress a social system in which those morals are applied.