john Locke believed that monarchs are not chosen by God but by the consent of the governed in order to protect natural rights. He argued that individuals have certain inherent rights, such as life, liberty, and property, which the government is obligated to protect.
Thomas Hobbes believed that monarchs derive their authority from the consent of the governed rather than being chosen by God. He argued that political legitimacy comes from a social contract among individuals in a society.
Hobbes believed in a social contract theory where individuals agree to give up some freedoms in exchange for a secure society governed by a sovereign. Bossuet believed in the divine right of kings, asserting that monarchs were appointed by God and were accountable only to God, not to the people. Hobbes focused on the importance of a strong central authority to maintain order, while Bossuet emphasized the absolute authority of the monarchy based on divine right.
James I was a devout believer in the divine right of kings, which held that monarchs derived their authority from God. He believed in the Anglican Church and opposed the Puritans. James also believed in the importance of maintaining peace within his kingdom, which influenced his foreign policy decisions.
Thomas Hobbes believed that humans were inherently selfish and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. This view influenced his argument that monarchs needed absolute power to maintain order and prevent chaos in society, as individuals could not be trusted to govern themselves. Monarchs were seen as necessary to impose order and control over a potentially unruly and selfish population.
The Enlightenment was all about how everyone was equal and had the right to make their own decisions, and not always trust what the government was telling them. The monarchs wanted everyone to obey and not question their orders.
Thomas Hobbes believed that monarchs derive their authority from the consent of the governed rather than being chosen by God. He argued that political legitimacy comes from a social contract among individuals in a society.
There have been many monarchs in history who believed they governed because God willed it. This was known as the Divine Right of Kings.
The monarchs of Europe believed that they were divinely chosen.
protection
the monarchs
Only to God. They believed they ruled by Divine Right.
monarchs or pages
By autocratic monarchs called tsars (analog of the Western European kings).
John Locke rejected the concept of divine right, which held that monarchs derived their authority directly from God. Instead, he argued that government legitimacy comes from the consent of the governed and the protection of individual rights. Locke believed that rulers should be accountable to the people, and if they failed to fulfill their responsibilities, citizens had the right to overthrow them. His ideas laid the groundwork for modern democratic thought and the principles of individual liberty.
many believed that's what god wanted.
The colonies were governed either directly or indirectly by the mother country, protected by the mother country, and the monarchs were leaders of the colonies.
They were the absolute rulers/monarchs of their country and, in additon, were believed to be descendants of Gods.