answersLogoWhite

0

Thomas Hobbes be lived in no social contract what so ever. His theory stated that the origins of government came into being because humans were "brutal, nasty creatures" and that we were meant to be ruled. A social contract is an agreement, there is no agreement between the authority in this theory. It simply rules.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Philosophy

What does thomas hobbes say about the origin of civil society organisations?

Thomas Hobbes believed that civil society organizations, such as the government, were created by a social contract among individuals who surrendered some of their freedoms to a central authority in exchange for protection and security. In his view, without this social contract, human life would be solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short in a state of nature.


Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes?

Thomas Hobbes was a 17th-century philosopher known for his work on political theory and social contract. He believed that humans are inherently self-interested and in a constant state of competition. Hobbes argued for a powerful central authority to maintain order and prevent conflict, as seen in his most famous work, Leviathan.


What was Thomas Hobbes view on the rights of citizens?

Thomas Hobbes believed that citizens should relinquish some of their rights to a sovereign authority in exchange for protection and security. He argued that people should submit to a powerful leader or government in order to maintain social order and prevent chaos. Hobbes believed in a social contract where individuals cede their rights to ensure peace and stability in society.


Who opposed to thomas hobbes ideas?

Philosophers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau opposed Thomas Hobbes' ideas. They disagreed with his pessimistic view of human nature and his belief in absolute monarchy, instead advocating for ideas like natural rights and social contract theory.


What was Thomas Hobbes theory?

Thomas Hobbes is best known for his social contract theory, where he argued that in the state of nature, humans are guided by self-preservation and the pursuit of power, leading to a perpetual state of conflict. To escape this chaos, individuals would voluntarily give up some of their freedom to a governing authority in exchange for protection and security. This authority, in Hobbes' view, should have absolute power to maintain order and prevent the descent into anarchy.

Related Questions

Thomas Hobbes was an Enlightenment thinker considered to be the originator of social contract theory. According to Hobbes and his ideas on social contract which of the following would be true?

According to Thomas Hobbes and his ideas on social contract theory, individuals consent to surrender certain freedoms and submit to the authority of a sovereign in exchange for security and order. In his view, the natural state of humanity is one of chaos and conflict, necessitating a strong central authority to prevent anarchy. Thus, a legitimate government derives its power from the consent of the governed, who agree to this social contract to ensure their safety and stability.


What does thomas hobbes say about the origin of civil society organisations?

Thomas Hobbes believed that civil society organizations, such as the government, were created by a social contract among individuals who surrendered some of their freedoms to a central authority in exchange for protection and security. In his view, without this social contract, human life would be solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short in a state of nature.


Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes?

Thomas Hobbes was a 17th-century philosopher known for his work on political theory and social contract. He believed that humans are inherently self-interested and in a constant state of competition. Hobbes argued for a powerful central authority to maintain order and prevent conflict, as seen in his most famous work, Leviathan.


What was Thomas Hobbes view on the rights of citizens?

Thomas Hobbes believed that citizens should relinquish some of their rights to a sovereign authority in exchange for protection and security. He argued that people should submit to a powerful leader or government in order to maintain social order and prevent chaos. Hobbes believed in a social contract where individuals cede their rights to ensure peace and stability in society.


Who opposed to thomas hobbes ideas?

Philosophers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau opposed Thomas Hobbes' ideas. They disagreed with his pessimistic view of human nature and his belief in absolute monarchy, instead advocating for ideas like natural rights and social contract theory.


What was Thomas Hobbes theory?

Thomas Hobbes is best known for his social contract theory, where he argued that in the state of nature, humans are guided by self-preservation and the pursuit of power, leading to a perpetual state of conflict. To escape this chaos, individuals would voluntarily give up some of their freedom to a governing authority in exchange for protection and security. This authority, in Hobbes' view, should have absolute power to maintain order and prevent the descent into anarchy.


What distinguished Thomas Hobbes from other enlightenment thinkers?

Thomas Hobbes stood out from other Enlightenment thinkers due to his pessimistic view of human nature, advocating for strong central authority to prevent chaos and ensure social order. Unlike his contemporaries who believed in the innate goodness of humans, Hobbes argued that people were inherently self-serving and driven by fear and desire. His work laid the foundation for modern political theory and social contract philosophy.


What is thomas hobbes social contract view og the government?

Thomas Hobbes' social contract theory posits that individuals in a state of nature, characterized by chaos and constant conflict, consent to surrender some of their freedoms to a sovereign authority in exchange for security and order. This authority, often an absolute ruler, derives its power from the collective agreement of the governed, who prioritize peace and stability over individual liberties. Hobbes believed that without such a contract, life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." Thus, a strong central authority is necessary to prevent anarchy and ensure the safety of its citizens.


What are some of thomas hobbes works?

Thomas Hobbes was an enlightenment thinker who believed in the struggle of man. Without government, he argued, life was essentially meaningless. Highly pessimistic, Hobbes did not see an inherent goodness in man, as many of his contemporaries did, and as such took a strict view on the idea of the 'social contract'. His works were numerous and varied throughout his life, but he is the most famous for The Leviathan, De Corpore, and De Homine. Interestingly enough, in the popular cartoon "Calvin and Hobbes" the character of Hobbes is based largely on the philosopher. Hobbes the Tiger is fairly pessimistic and puts a good deal of faith in Calvin's parents-- the perceived government structure.


What are the key differences between Locke and Hobbes' perspectives on the social contract?

Locke and Hobbes had different views on the social contract. Hobbes believed that people needed a strong ruler to maintain order and prevent chaos, while Locke thought that individuals had natural rights and should form a government to protect those rights. Hobbes' view was more authoritarian, while Locke's was more focused on individual freedoms and limited government power.


What was Thomas hobbes view?

Thomas Hobbes believed that humans were inherently selfish and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that in the state of nature, life would be "nasty, brutish, and short" due to constant competition and conflict. Hobbes believed that a strong, centralized authority (such as a sovereign ruler) was necessary to maintain social order and prevent chaos.


What is hobbes view of natural rights?

Thomas Hobbes believed that natural rights did not exist because in a state of nature, there were no rights or protections. Instead, he argued that individuals voluntarily gave up certain freedoms to live together peacefully under a social contract with a sovereign authority. This authority was tasked with maintaining order and protecting the common good.