if they were black it was ok
That it was wrong and they had an obligation to change it
Henry Highland Garnet believed in more aggressive tactics to end slavery, advocating for armed resistance and violent uprising. William Lloyd Garrison, on the other hand, was a pacifist who believed in nonviolent resistance and moral persuasion to end slavery.
Transcendentalists generally believed that slavery was morally wrong and went against their principles of individualism, self-reliance, and equality. They advocated for the abolition of slavery and believed that all individuals, regardless of race, should have equal rights and opportunities. Some transcendentalists, such as Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, actively participated in the abolitionist movement.
They felt they had a moral obligation to make change.
It is not clear from your question whose attitude you are asking about, although the inference is that it is a god. Could be Zeus, who knows. The attitude of Zeus toward humans would have to be described as paternalistic. His attitude toward other gods would be described as competitive.
no i dont think so:)
Georgia didn't agree
outraged
He has a very strong testimony about it.
Slavery was outlawed in the US in 1807. Anything after that was considered contraband.
the Romans took a practical approach, unlike greeks who studied the world just to know about it
Helen Jean Poulton has written: 'The attitude of Oregon toward slavery and secession, 1848-1865' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Slavery
what was samuel parris's attitude toward children?
the united states supported this trade while European countries opposed it
The preposition "toward" typically follows the word "attitude." For example, one might say, "She has a positive attitude toward her work."
Beverley B. Munford has written: 'Virginia's attitude toward slavery and secession' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Politics and government, Slavery, History, Antislavery movements
mayellas attitude toward the courtroom is very sassy (cocky)