Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently selfish and driven by self-preservation. He argued that in order to avoid chaos and conflict, individuals needed to submit to a strong central authority, or government, that could maintain order and protect their interests.
Hobbes believe people exchange many personal freedoms for government protection
John Locke believed in the concept of natural rights, emphasizing the idea of individual freedom and the social contract as a voluntary agreement between people and government. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, believed in a more authoritarian approach, arguing that people are inherently selfish and need a strong central authority to maintain order and prevent chaos.
In Thomas Hobbes's concept of the social contract, people exchange their individual freedom or certain rights for protection by the government. This exchange allows for the establishment of order and security within society, as individuals agree to give up some of their liberties in exchange for the state's protection of their lives and property.
Thomas Hobbes argued that an absolute monarchy was the most effective form of government. He believed that a powerful sovereign ruler was necessary to prevent the chaos and conflict that he believed would result from people's natural state of self-interest and competition.
Thomas Hobbes believed in a strong and centralized government to control society and prevent chaos, while John Locke advocated for the protection of individual rights and limited government interference. Hobbes viewed humans as naturally selfish and violent, whereas Locke believed in the inherent goodness and reason of people.
thomas hobbes
Hobbes believe people exchange many personal freedoms for government protection
The pilgrims, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke
Thomas Hobbes believed that the purpose of government was to protect people from their evil ways or own selfishness.
John Locke believed in the concept of natural rights, emphasizing the idea of individual freedom and the social contract as a voluntary agreement between people and government. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, believed in a more authoritarian approach, arguing that people are inherently selfish and need a strong central authority to maintain order and prevent chaos.
Hobbes believe people exchange many personal freedoms for government protection
i think thomas hobbes is a very intelligent man! but his book the LEVIATHAN is very strang..
In Thomas Hobbes's concept of the social contract, people exchange their individual freedom or certain rights for protection by the government. This exchange allows for the establishment of order and security within society, as individuals agree to give up some of their liberties in exchange for the state's protection of their lives and property.
Thomas Hobbes argued that an absolute monarchy was the most effective form of government. He believed that a powerful sovereign ruler was necessary to prevent the chaos and conflict that he believed would result from people's natural state of self-interest and competition.
Thomas Hobbes believed in a strong and centralized government to control society and prevent chaos, while John Locke advocated for the protection of individual rights and limited government interference. Hobbes viewed humans as naturally selfish and violent, whereas Locke believed in the inherent goodness and reason of people.
Thomas Hobbes
John Locke believed that the social contract was a mutual agreement between people and the government, where the government's power was limited and based on protecting people's natural rights. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, saw the social contract as a surrender of individual rights to a strong government in exchange for protection and order.