There is no such clear distinction. If your knowledge is not factually based, you have no basis on which to answer questions.
First learn basics, then how to analyse, an then ask questions to which you can then apply facts and analysis.
Subjective questions are inquiries that elicit personal opinions, feelings, or beliefs rather than objective facts or data. The answers to subjective questions can vary depending on the individual's perspective and experiences. Examples include questions about preferences, emotions, and values.
Objective questions ask for specific, verifiable facts or information, while subjective questions involve personal opinions, interpretations, or feelings. Objective questions typically have one correct answer, while subjective questions can have multiple valid interpretations based on individual perspectives.
A subjective question asks for personal opinions, feelings, or interpretations rather than facts. Answers to subjective questions can vary based on individual perspectives and experiences.
Metaethics questions focus on the nature of ethics itself, such as the meaning of moral language, the existence of moral facts, and the origins of moral principles. Examples include: "Are moral values objective or subjective?" and "What is the relationship between morality and religion?" In contrast, normative ethics questions deal with specific moral issues and how we should act in particular situations. Examples include: "Is lying ever justified?" and "What is the right thing to do in this specific case?" Metaethics questions are more abstract and theoretical, while normative ethics questions are more practical and concrete in nature.
It is true. if you got a group of lets say 100 people together and asked for their opinion on something not everyone opinion would be the same because someones opinion depends on the different things they have gone through or are going through in life. So if you have facts rather then opinions in a persuasive writing then you would have a better chance of persuading someone.
I do not understand your question. Are you asking about what questions are commonly asked? If so, usually they ask your opinion and facts about the book and movie.
it involves asking questions and using verifiable facts to answer them.
it involves asking questions and using verifiable facts to answer them. (Apex)
The people who write stories for newspapers are known as journalists. They do this by collecting information from many people and gathering facts by asking questions.
A Journalist
That depends upon the questions asked. If the questions are about mathematics or the sciences, it is mostly fact-based. 2+2=4 is a fact. Whether or not an animal is endangered can be looked up on a list, but "endangered" has a definition. Those are facts. Questions asking why people do or do not like the current President of the United States are asking for an opinion. Questions asking for advice will get an opinion. Opinions often are based on misinformation, so that is extremely important to remember when perusing social media.
Nutrition.Gov is an excellent place to get the basic nutrition facts for a better diet. Also the Mayo Clinic is a resourceful place to find answers for many questions on diet and nutritional facts.
In my opinion, Wikianswers is better because anyone can change facts on Wikipedia, which may not be accurate. With Wikianswers, people ask questions and you give them a fact or accurate opinion.
Fact are telling you something true
i asking yall
Thats why im asking you !! >:(
The Facts of Life - 1979 For the Asking 4-10 was released on: USA: 15 December 1982