0
Leaders should do whatever is necessary to achieve their goals.
What else can I help you with?
How would Machiavelli approach a situation where the ends justify the means?
Machiavelli would likely support using any means necessary to achieve a desired outcome, even if they are unethical or immoral, as long as the end result benefits the ruler or the state.
Which philosopher most likely wrote and in the actions of men and especially of princes ... the end of justices the means?
Niccolò Machiavelli is the philosopher who most likely wrote those words. He is known for his book "The Prince," in which he discusses the nature of power and politics, including the idea that the end justifies the means.
The philosopher Xunzi would most likely support which of these concepts?
Xunzi would likely support the idea that human nature is inherently selfish and that ethical behavior must be learned and cultivated through education and ritual practices. He believed that individuals are not born with virtuous tendencies, but must develop them through moral discipline and guidance.
What does the term Machiavellian mean?
To act in a machiavellian way is to act as though the ends justify the means.Which I realize is not terribly precise, so allow me to be more specific. Niccolo Machiavelli was a political philosopher/writer during the renaissance in Italy. He is most famous for his book (very short) which was titled "The Prince" (which just means ruler.) The general theme of the book is that you should not worry about doing what is right or wrong, and instead worry about doing what is effective.For example. Let us say that there is a ruler of a country, and the peasants of this country are rebelling.A moral ruler would try and negotiate with the rebels, to ensure that bloodshed was kept to a minimum; that way everyone would be as happy as possible.A machiavellian ruler would (probably) get his army together, crush the rebellion brutally, and make examples of the leaders.Machiavelli would argue that the second course of action would be much much better. This way, the rebellion is put down quickly, and more to the point, future rebellions are much less likely. If whenever people rebel you give them what they want, they are likely to rebel again. If every time people rebel you kill them horribly, people lose interest in that sort of thing.In short, in this circumstance, Machiavelli would argue that it was better to kill those people (even though killing is an immoral action) because it would be better for the ruler (and arguably for the country as a whole.)I realize this is a fairly long answer, but I hope it is helpful. By the 16th century, as Italy's troubles mounted, this tendency to free politics from any relationship to religion became an important part of the thinking of a number of distinguished Florentine writers, including the best known, Niccolò Machiavelli. Stimulated by the political crisis of his time, Machiavelli sought to base statecraft or the art of governance on science rather than on Christian principles. He focused on how to preserve the state by any effective means. His acceptance of the principle that the end justifies the means, so bluntly expressed in his most famous work, Il principe (1532; The Prince, 1640), reflects the degree to which the new political environment had changed popular thinking.
Are individuals with mental illness more likely to be victims of certain crimes?
Yes, individuals with mental illness are more likely to be victims of certain crimes, such as assault, abuse, and exploitation, due to factors like vulnerability, stigma, and lack of support.
What is the cause of death of niccolo Machiavelli?
Niccolò Machiavelli died from complications of a recurring fever, likely due to an infection such as malaria or typhoid fever. He passed away on June 21, 1527, at the age of 58 in Florence, Italy.
Who observed that political leaders must sometimes engage in evil actions in order to preserve the state?
This is a relatively widely known concept that likely has no singular origin, though it was most famously elaborated upon by Niccolo Machiavelli in his work 'The Prince'
Who observed that political leaders must sometimes engage in evil actions in order to preserve that state?
This is a relatively widely known concept that likely has no singular origin, though it was most famously elaborated upon by Niccolo Machiavelli in his work 'The Prince'
How would Machiavelli approach a situation where the ends justify the means?
Machiavelli would likely support using any means necessary to achieve a desired outcome, even if they are unethical or immoral, as long as the end result benefits the ruler or the state.
How did Machiavelli ideas inflence the play Othello?
Machiavelli's ideas of political strategy and manipulation likely influenced the themes of power, manipulation, and deception in Othello. This can be seen through the character of Iago, who embodies Machiavellian principles by manipulating others for his own gain. Shakespeare may have drawn inspiration from Machiavelli's writings to create a complex and intriguing antagonist in Iago.
Was la volpe a thief in 1460?
Most Likely Yes Some People Think He Did Exist, Apparently SomeHistorians Have Found SomeText From Some Italian Authors From The Renaissance Such As Niccolo Machiavelli Saying About Various Crime In The City And One Statement Says " The Notorious Fox Is Still On The Run" That Statement Is Taken From A Diary Statement In 1473So Yes He Could Of Been In Renaissance Italy.
What characteristics of ruling families in Italian city-states during the Renaissance would Machiavelli author of The Prince have appreciated?
Machiavelli would have likely appreciated ruling families that displayed traits such as power, ambition, shrewdness, and a willingness to do whatever it takes to maintain control. He believed in the importance of strong leadership and the use of cunning political tactics to stay in power, which would align with the characteristics of successful ruling families in Italian city-states during the Renaissance.
What does niccolo Machiavelli think that a prince should prefer to be loved or feared and why?
What he meant is that, after conquering new territory, you can expect resistance to your rule, unless the locals love you enough not to want to rebel, or are so weak that they do not have the means. What he said is that it would be best to be both loved and feared, but since that is impossible, it is safer if people cannot challenge your rule than if they can, but don't want to.
What does machiavelli mean with for how you live is so far removed from how you ought to live that he who abandons what is done for ought to be done will rather learn to bring about his own ruin than?
Machiavelli suggests that there is often a significant gap between reality and ideal moral principles. He argues that those who disregard practical, effective actions in favor of lofty ideals are likely to fail and cause their own downfall. Essentially, he emphasizes the importance of adapting to the complexities of real life rather than strictly adhering to theoretical ethics, as this adaptability is crucial for successful leadership and governance.
What effect might the March 1917 revolution in Russia have had on the decision of the US to join the war?
The leadership of the US likely wanted to enter World War 1 from the beginning of the war, but lacked public support. The sinking of the Lusitania turned public support in favor of going to war. It is unlikely that the Russian Revolution had an impact on either the public or the leadership's willingness to go to war, as American foreign policy was still very isolationist.
Which is most likely to effective for implementing major change?
Implementing major change is most likely to be effective when there is strong leadership support, clear communication about the reasons for change, and engagement of key stakeholders in the process. It is also important to have a well-defined plan with measurable goals and milestones to track progress.
Are modern politicians likely to succeed by following al or most of Machiavelli's recommendations?
It is a given for modern politicians to succeed by following Machiavelli's recommendations, the rhetoric has been studied for greater than 100 years, and has been studied by several men/women of power. Thus proving Machiavelli's advice to be a success. History has and always will repeat itself, therefore by studying and following historical success, can only lead to success for the individual studying such material.
