0
What else can I help you with?
When would you feel it would be justified to go against accepted principles or policy?
Going against accepted principles or policies may be justified when those principles or policies are unethical, harmful, or illegal. It may also be justified when circumstances have significantly changed, making the existing principles or policies no longer relevant or effective. Additionally, if following the principles or policies would result in greater harm than deviating from them, it may be justifiable to do so.
Which of the following was one result of the treaty of san stefano?
One result of the Treaty of San Stefano was the creation of a Greater Bulgaria, which significantly expanded Bulgaria's territory at the expense of the Ottoman Empire. However, this expansion was later revised by the Congress of Berlin in 1878.
Which of the following can be a result of a person's logic containing errors that weaken his or her argument?
Poor decision-making, flawed reasoning, and incorrect conclusions can be the results of a person's logic containing errors that weaken their argument.
What is the difference between rule utilitarianism and act utilitarianism?
Rule utilitarianism focuses on following rules that lead to the greatest overall happiness, even if individual actions may not always result in the most happiness. Act utilitarianism, on the other hand, focuses on choosing actions that directly produce the most happiness in a specific situation, without necessarily following a set rule.
Which of the following came to be valued more highly as a result of Enlightenment thinking?
Reason and individualism were valued more highly as a result of Enlightenment thinking. The movement emphasized the importance of relying on logic and critical thinking to understand the world, as well as promoting the idea that individuals have the capacity to think for themselves and make independent decisions.
What of the following is not a result of Philip iis anti Protestant policies?
Increased trade with Protestant countries.
What of the following is not a result of Philip 2's anti-protestant policies?
The persecution of Protestants, the expulsion of Dutch Protestants from Spain, and the establishment of the Spanish Inquisition were all results of Philip II's anti-Protestant policies. Peaceful coexistence with Protestant nations is not a result of Philip II's anti-Protestant policies.
What of the following is not a result of Philip anti Protestant policies?
Philip II of Spain's anti-Protestant policies primarily resulted in increased persecution of Protestants, the strengthening of the Inquisition, and the unification of Catholic powers against Protestant states. However, one outcome that was not a direct result of his policies was the widespread conversion of Protestant populations to Catholicism; instead, his actions often solidified Protestant resistance and led to further religious conflict in Europe.
Equality of result policies are primarily directed at?
religious
What is the result for the following operation 0 AND 1?
The result is 0.
When would you feel it would be justified to go against accepted principles or policy?
Going against accepted principles or policies may be justified when those principles or policies are unethical, harmful, or illegal. It may also be justified when circumstances have significantly changed, making the existing principles or policies no longer relevant or effective. Additionally, if following the principles or policies would result in greater harm than deviating from them, it may be justifiable to do so.
What was the result of japan and trade policies with Europe?
very good 100%
Which of the following was a result of the Battle of the Midway?
If I knew what "the following" was, I'd tell you. :/
What did not Philip anti Protestant policies lead to?
The belief in his divine right to rule as an absolute monarch was not a result of Philip II's protestant policies.
As a result of the labor policies of the New Deal many stronger were formed?
unions
Philip II's anti-protestant policies did not lead to what?
The belief in his divine right to rule as an absolute monarch was not a result of Philip II's protestant policies.
What Philip II's anti-Protestant policies did NOT lead to?
The belief in his divine right to rule as an absolute monarch was not a result of Philip II's protestant policies.
