A.
Filmer suggested that governments represent the will of the majority, whereas Enlightenment thinkers advocated for minority rights.
B.
Filmer argued for a strong monarchy, whereas Enlightenment philosophers claimed that government was not necessary because natural law would allow society to advance.
C.
Enlightenment philosophers advocated government systems that protected the natural rights of man, whereas Filmer argued that people would be lost without the paternal monarch.
D.
Enlightenment philosophers advocated monarchical governments in which a central king would ensure the rights of the people, whereas Filmer argued for representative democracy.
Enlightenment philosophers argued that the divine right of kings was not a legitimate basis for political authority because it lacked rational justification and allowed for unchecked tyranny. They believed that political power should be based on the consent of the governed and that all individuals were entitled to natural rights regardless of a king's divine sanction.
Enlightenment philosophers argued against the divine right of kings by asserting that political authority should be based on reason, natural law, and social contracts, not on the divine mandate of a monarch. They believed that all individuals possessed inherent rights and freedoms that should be protected, leading to the idea of popular sovereignty and government accountability to the people.
One example of an absolute statement in philosophy is "There is no absolute truth." This statement makes a universal claim about the nature of truth itself, suggesting that no truths are universally valid or objective.
Some examples of logic questions in philosophy include: "What is the nature of truth?" "How do we know what we know?" "Are all beliefs based on evidence?" "Can a statement be both true and false at the same time?" "What is the relationship between language and reality?"
An enlightenment statement is a concise expression that conveys wisdom, insight, or clarity about a certain aspect of life or existence. It is typically profound, thought-provoking, and aimed at providing enlightenment or understanding to the reader or listener.
Enlightenment philosophers argued that the divine right of kings was not a legitimate basis for political authority because it lacked rational justification and allowed for unchecked tyranny. They believed that political power should be based on the consent of the governed and that all individuals were entitled to natural rights regardless of a king's divine sanction.
Many leaders supported the enlightenment ideal of individual liberty, but they were also unwilling to demand an end to slavery.
A philosophy statement communicates your goals and feelings about a subject. For instance, a philosophy statement for teachers might describe how you teach, what your goals for teaching are, and a justification for how you teach.
Enlightenment philosophers argued against the divine right of kings by asserting that political authority should be based on reason, natural law, and social contracts, not on the divine mandate of a monarch. They believed that all individuals possessed inherent rights and freedoms that should be protected, leading to the idea of popular sovereignty and government accountability to the people.
One example of an absolute statement in philosophy is "There is no absolute truth." This statement makes a universal claim about the nature of truth itself, suggesting that no truths are universally valid or objective.
Some examples of logic questions in philosophy include: "What is the nature of truth?" "How do we know what we know?" "Are all beliefs based on evidence?" "Can a statement be both true and false at the same time?" "What is the relationship between language and reality?"
The term for when one term gives a response to another is "antecedent-consequent relationship." This is commonly used in logic and philosophy to describe how one statement (the antecedent) leads to another statement (the consequent).
I want to know a brief idea about Philosophy. That consists of three valuable paradism these are Problems of Philosophy, Logic & Ethics.
all individuals have natural rights
the power of reason is the most important.
Jefferson support Enlightenment principles but continued to own slaves.
relationship between pollution ,taxation and financial statement