0
Ion know
What else can I help you with?
Why is this passage from an Indian fathers plea an example of lakes use of logos?
because it uses specific evidence to support his argument. :) yw.
What type of faulty logic is used if you make a statement or express a conclusion when there is no evidence to support what is said and you ignore contrary facts?
The faulty logic being used in this scenario is known as argument from ignorance or argument from lack of evidence. This occurs when someone claims something is true simply because there is no evidence against it, ignoring the absence of evidence in support of the claim.
How does this passage demonstrate the authors use of logos?
The passage uses statistics and facts to support its argument, appealing to the reader's logic and reasoning. The author presents a clear and structured argument based on evidence, making it evident that they are using logos to persuade the audience.
How do you restate your opinion?
To restate your opinion, you can use different words or phrases to convey the same message. This can help reinforce your viewpoint and make it clearer to others. Additionally, you may provide additional reasoning or examples to support your restated opinion.
What passage from an Indian father plea an example of lakes use of logos?
One example of logos in an Indian father's plea could be when he presents statistical data on the success rates of education and employment among children who follow the path he is advocating for. This evidence-based approach appeals to reason and rationality to support his argument.
What is supported inference?
A supported inference when you draw a conclusion about something using evidence. The evidence is the support for what you have inferred.
What is an example of a sentence using the word inference?
Your inference seems to indicate your lack of support for the project at hand.
What is a sentence for the word inference?
(*an inference is something intended, or suspected to be intended, while not directly said) The sheriff said that someone was being questioned, with the inference that the man was a suspect in the case. The inference of the Senator's vote was that he did not support the President. By inference, anyone going to Mecca could be considered a pilgrim.
How much evidence is the sufficient to support an inference that you make from a text?
The sufficiency of evidence to support an inference from a text depends on the context and the complexity of the inference itself. Generally, a strong inference requires multiple pieces of relevant evidence that align with the conclusion, demonstrating consistency and coherence. Additionally, the quality and reliability of the evidence matter; credible sources and clear reasoning enhance the strength of the inference. Ultimately, the more substantial and diverse the supporting evidence, the more convincing the inference becomes.
Which inference do these lines best support?
STEPHANO'S INTEREST IN CALIBAN IS PURELY SELFISH. (APEX)
Which central idea to the following passage from the Gettysburg address best support?
Where is the following passage?
Which inference does this excerpt from president Reagan's speech support?
To provide an accurate response, I would need the specific excerpt from President Reagan's speech that you are referring to. Please share the text, and I can help identify which inference it supports.
What is the KIS strategy in reading?
The K stands for key words. the I means Infer. and the s means support the inference.
Does volcanic activity in different parts of the world supports the inference that volcanoes are located mainly in?
zones of crustal activity support the infrence
What is the difference between argument and inference?
An argument is a set of statements that includes a conclusion and premises intended to support that conclusion. In contrast, inference is the mental process of drawing a conclusion from given premises or evidence. While an argument explicitly presents reasoning to persuade or justify a claim, inference is the cognitive act of arriving at a conclusion based on reasoning or available information. In essence, an argument presents a case, while inference is the process of understanding or deducing that case.
What is the difference between an inference and fact?
The difference between an inference and a fact is that an inference is generally something which is worked out or deduced from other factual information (but can also relate to something being suggested, although in this case I think the original definition applies), whereas a fact is something which is known to be a true piece of information, without necessarily relying on other information to support this.
How does the author support the main idea in this paragraph?
Read the Passage
