Neither appeared instantly, both by degrees.
In math there is no such thing under our system as an answer to the square root of a negative number. Just because that is true does not mean that you cannot solve equations with negative square roots in them.
You are asking for artificial lines to be drawn in a spectrum, that is not only the wrong question, but one that will never bring you the right answer.
It is a philosophical question without a definitive answer. Some believe the egg came first, as mutations in the reproductive cells of an earlier species led to the first chicken egg. Others argue that the first chicken must have hatched from an egg, so the egg came first.
I think the egg came first-not nessacerikly a chickens egg but an egg may have come first I think the chicken came first because, the chicken evolved from soemthing that wasnt a chicken and once it was a chicken it had an egg. but the egg the chickn came from had a chicken in... im confused This is one of those questions that has been debated for years. We may never know the answer...or perhaps we now do. In 2006 a geneticist, philosopher and chicken farmer say they have the answer. It was the egg. See link.
The egg came first.Because there was some kind of mutation and the chicken was born not in a egg. Then the mutated specie began to have eggs. Then a lot of chicken were born that's how we have chickens now.
The egg came first because genetic mutations that led to the modern chicken would have occurred in the egg before the bird hatched. This means that the egg, containing the genetic mutation for the modern chicken, existed before the first chicken hatched from it.
According to evolutionist theory, the egg came first. This is because the genetic mutation needed to create the chicken would have occurred in the egg before the first chicken hatched.
the egg because dinos lay eggs
the egg came first because where are you going to get the chicken if their is no egg... you can't get a chicken out of thin air ...you need a egg to get the first chicken.... then that chicken lays a egg ...then that one does , then the next and so on...the earth's matter made up the first egg....kill the first chicken...you'll still have a egg to get another chicken...kill the first egg.... chickens would cease to ''egg-sist''(exsist).The egg came first from another animal that adapted into the chicken. Kind of like how humans came from monkeys.
Egg
egg
either the egg or the chicken came first. of course, god couldve put an egg on the earth, and it couldve hatched into a chicken, or the chicken couldve came first and hatched an egg...
It is a philosophical question without a definitive answer. Some believe the egg came first, as mutations in the reproductive cells of an earlier species led to the first chicken egg. Others argue that the first chicken must have hatched from an egg, so the egg came first.
I think the egg came first-not nessacerikly a chickens egg but an egg may have come first I think the chicken came first because, the chicken evolved from soemthing that wasnt a chicken and once it was a chicken it had an egg. but the egg the chickn came from had a chicken in... im confused This is one of those questions that has been debated for years. We may never know the answer...or perhaps we now do. In 2006 a geneticist, philosopher and chicken farmer say they have the answer. It was the egg. See link.
a chicken? its like the question: what came 1st, an egg or a chicken.
chicken.
The chicken
The chicken
dude, i think the answer is pretty obvious. the chicken came first. i am a christian, and i think The Lord God would create a chicken, not an egg to become the first chicken. imagine an egg without a mother to raise it. so go rub it in your buddies' faces that you know the answer to the ancient chicken and egg riddle.