Who argues that Intelligent Design has no place?

Answer 1

Young-earth Creationists disagree with the Intelligent Design movement for denying the designer. They also don't agree with long-age proponents of ID.

A different approach:

On the contrary, Intelligent design means, by definition, that there is a designer. While Young Earth creationists and Old Earth creationists disagree on God's methods, they certainly agree completely that Evolution is the adversary.

Answer 2

It has never been argued that Intelligent Design has no place in religious instruction. It can be taught alongside, or instead of, the biblical creation stories. However, scientists and science teachers, among others, say that Intelligent Design has no place in the classroom and can not be taught alongside science.

For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation

Answer 3

Much (though not all) of the Western world's scientific and educational communities have spoken for keeping Intelligent Design out of the Science classroom. Others feel that this is arbitrary, since they feel that scientific research should have as wide a syllabus as possible, including areas that are as yet outside of the paradigm. Many parts of science that were once considered quackery are now mainstream, including manned flight, quantum mechanics, black holes, etc. If sincere research leads some to describe an infinite wisdom that is apparent, this may be studied alongside other approaches.

See also:

What are some proofs offered by Creationists

Can you show that God exists

God's wisdom seen in His creations

More about God's wisdom

Answer 4

Many scientists and science educators argue that Intelligent Design has no place in science education because it is not based on scientific evidence and lacks predictive power. They believe that teaching Intelligent Design alongside evolution confuses students about the nature of science and promotes a misunderstanding of the scientific method.