The belief that there is no absolute moral orientation, and no absolute right or wrong, is called Moral Relativism. Among the most prominent contemporary philosophical defenders of moral relativism are Gilbert Harmann and David B. Wong. Notable historical philosophers and those of similar profession that proposed and described forms of moral relativism include the Greek historian Herodotus and sophist Protagoras, and the Chinese Daoist philosopher Zhuangzhi.
herodotus
An example of a relativist statement is "What is considered right or wrong depends on the cultural context in which it occurs." This suggests that morality is not absolute and is influenced by societal norms and values.
The word "moral" can function as both an adjective and a noun. As an adjective, it describes principles of right and wrong behavior. As a noun, it refers to a lesson or principle taught by a story or experience.
No, being right and wrong are mutually exclusive. Being right means that your statement or belief aligns with reality or truth, while being wrong means it does not. It is possible to change your mind and go from being wrong to right, or vice versa.
1.To do with right and wrong.(Carl faced the moral dilemma of saying nothing or telling the truth) 2.Good and honest.(A moral person would never lie or cheat.) 3.Your morals are your beliefs about what is right and wrong. 4.The lesson taught by a story.
Sophists
Sophists
herodotus
herodotus
herodotus
yesNoAnswer:There no absolute standards for right or wrong, as a consequence this cannot be answered
The belief that there is no absolute moral orientation, and no absolute right or wrong, is called Moral Relativism. Among the most prominent contemporary philosophical defenders of moral relativism are Gilbert Harmann and David B. Wong. Notable historical philosophers and those of similar profession that proposed and described forms of moral relativism include the Greek historian Herodotus and sophist Protagoras, and the Chinese Daoist philosopher Zhuangzhi.
No. There is no "right way" and "wrong way" of writing pseudo code, let alone qualifying with "absolute". However, a pseudo code is "wrong" if it cannot be understood, or it is incorrect in semantic (what the code tries to describe, solve, etc)
that sophists thought that knowledge was a way to improve ur life and Socrates thought that there was an absolute right or wrong
The philosophical perspective that denies the existence of absolute right and wrong is often associated with relativism. Prominent figures who have contributed to this idea include Friedrich Nietzsche, who argued that moral values are not universal but rather culturally and historically contingent. Additionally, postmodern philosophers like Michel Foucault also challenged the notion of objective morality, suggesting that truths are constructed through power dynamics and social contexts.
he was just smart enough to know what was right or wrong
Sophists were a category of teachers who specialised in using the techniques of philosophy and rhetoric for the purpose of teaching.