Another contributor said:
Albert Barnes was an American theologian born in New York in 1798. He was a leader among the New School Presbyterians and a strong supporter of abolition.
Barnes made an exhaustive study of The Bible passages addressing slavery since many passages could only be interpreted as both approving and promoting slavery which was a common form of life for many people in biblical times. It must also be remembered that different parts of The Bible were written at different times by different authors. It is more an anthology of theological writings that span a long period of time. There is no single theme running throughout, it is a conglomeration of writings, some contradictory, which explains the infinite interpretations that exist today.
Barnes concluded, after his exhaustive study of all its passages, that the institution of slavery was in direct conflict with the primary principles we are to take from scripture including:
equality,
the brotherhood of God's family
the "golden rule,
"spiritual growth, and
God's abhorrence of oppression
Albert Barnes thought slavery was a sinful practice and it should cease and transform into employment. As for his own times, he is quoted as stating: "There is no power out of the church that could sustain slavery an hour, if it were not sustained in it." Think about that. Slavery may have been obliterated sooner in American history had it not been promoted from the pulpit. Barnes was an interesting man whose thinking was far ahead of his times.
Most human beings would say that slavery is wrong. Just because something is found in The Bible does not justify it being done. Consider that rape, incest, and murder are also found in the Bible as are most of the wayward ways of mankind.
Albert Einstein meant that people can choose to see the world as ordinary and mundane, or they can choose to see it as full of wonder and miracles. It's about perspective and how we choose to view the world around us.
Yes, Albert Einstein was known for his advocacy for peace and nonviolence. He was actively involved in promoting nuclear disarmament and peaceful resolutions to conflicts. Additionally, he was a signatory to many peace petitions and supported various peace movements.
Yes, William Penn did own slaves during his lifetime. Though he promoted religious freedom and fair treatment of Native Americans, he did not extend these beliefs to enslaved Africans on his own plantation.
Southerners have no part in slavery today. During the time period of slavery, obviously before the civil war, slaves WERE exceptionally important though. Slaves were used because they were cheap, hardworking people. If these slaves ever disobeyed their masters, they were severely whipped. Slaves were very popular because they were needed to tend to the master's plantation.
Because the other half are right.
Slavery is against the laws of nature.
Most human beings would say that slavery is wrong. Just because something is found in The Bible does not justify it being done. Consider that rape, incest, and murder are also found in the Bible as are most of the wayward ways of mankind.
Slavery has not been abolished though some countries have made it illegal.
there was no slavery in Ohio. PS. AT ONE TIME THERE WAS THOUGH
he did not like slavery. let it be known though that slavery was not why Lincoln had the war. it was to stop the south fromm seceding. but to answer your question, no, he did not like slavery.
child slavery did happen in West Africa (e.g. Olaudah Equiano was 12ish)Now though all slavery is banned
No he did not sopport slavery. In fact he was storngly oposed to salvery.
okay,someone founded St.patricks day.i think it was st.patrick though!
Yes, even though slavery is illegal, they don't enforce the law very well.yes
If the question is "Is the slavery a cause for the colonies declaring independence from Britain," then no. They wanted freedom from them. Slavery was a big issue in the Civil War, though.
somebody founded webkinz why do you care though so dont ask dumb questions like that