answersLogoWhite

0

Dred Scott believed he should be free because he had lived in free states and territories where slavery was illegal, which he argued should have conferred freedom upon him. He sued for his freedom based on the legal principle of once free, always free, but ultimately lost the case in a landmark Supreme Court decision.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Philosophy

Why did bred Scott argue that he should be freed from slavory?

Dred Scott argued that he should be freed from slavery because his owner had taken him to live in free territories, which he believed should make him a free man. He claimed that his residency in these free territories should have granted him his freedom according to the principles of "once free, always free."


Does Hume believe in free will?

David Hume, a philosopher from the 18th century, did not believe in free will in the traditional sense. He argued that our actions are determined by our desires and beliefs, rather than by any kind of free choice.


Do you believe in fate or free will?

Some people believe that everything is already destined to occur and that free will is an illusion (determinism and predeterminism); other people believe free will exists and that people have control over their own fates. Among these two dichotomous position lies a spectrum, varying from hard determinism to philosophical libertarianism. One of the main proponents in the argument that both determinism and free will are valid postulates is the concept of Philosophical Dualism. The answer to whether I (or you) believe in one or another depends on who is asked the question. There is no absolute or finite answer to such a subjective and ambiguous question.


Did Aristotle Believe that men and women should have equal rights in education and work?

No, Aristotle did not believe that men and women should have equal rights in education and work. He held that men and women had different roles in society based on their inherent natures, and that women were naturally subordinate to men.


What is Freedom and can man be free?

Freedom is the ability to act and make choices without constraint. Whether man can truly be free is a complex philosophical question, as some argue that external forces and societal structures limit our freedom, while others believe that individuals have the capacity to make meaningful choices and lead autonomous lives.

Related Questions

Who said that he should be free because he lived in a free territory?

Dred Scott.


What did dred Scott base his claim on freedom on?

Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.


What was Dred Scott argument to the supreme court?

Dred Scott argued that his time living in free territories should have made him a free man, as these territories prohibited slavery. He claimed that this should have nullified his status as a slave under the Missouri Compromise.


What did Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on?

Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.


What did the Dred Scott Decision did Not do?

First of all learn how to talk. Then go ask Your History teacher this question. you should have said "What did the Dred Scott decision do?" It was a slave who thought he was free and they went to court over it and the court said he was a slave and that he was not free.


Why did dred Scott agrue that he should be free?

because he onced lived in areas of the north where slavery was prohibited


Why did chief justice Taney think Dred Scott should not be free?

Chief Justice Taney believed that Dred Scott should not be free because he argued that African Americans, whether slave or free, were not considered citizens under the U.S. Constitution. Taney also argued that the federal government did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in the territories, which meant that Scott's residence in a free state did not make him free.


What was the supreme court case that said free soil was unconstitutional because it denied owners their property?

I believe it was called, Dred Scott.


What are facts about dred Scott?

His master unwisely took him into free soil, and then back into slave country. If Dred wanted his freedom, he should have applied for it on free soil, where it would have been granted automatically.


What did Dred Scott base his claim of freedom on?

Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.


Why did southeners believe that dred Scott was free?

Southerners believed that Dred Scott was not free because they viewed him as property, not as a person entitled to rights. The prevailing legal framework at the time considered enslaved individuals to be the property of their owners, and the Supreme Court's 1857 ruling in the Dred Scott case reinforced this notion by declaring that enslaved people could not sue for their freedom. Additionally, many Southerners held the belief that the extension of slavery into new territories was essential for their economic interests, leading them to support the idea that Scott should remain enslaved.


What was the issue in the dred Scott case?

He was a slave in a free state