yes, it would because of the disperse in weight on the object will allow less force to be applied.
Sunlight bringing thermal energy enters the greenhouse and gets reflected around. However, because of refraction, the light is unable to escape out of the greenhouse. As such, the heat stays inside as well.
The first part to answering this question is Newton's Laws of Motion. His first law states this: "Every object in a state of uniform motion will remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it" Thus, the external forces could be someone pushing an object or even friction (from the surface, amount of friction is called the coefficient of friction) so if the force needed to move an object is more than the force applied, then the object will be at rest, until a further force is applied which is great enough to move the object.
That's completely true. The only thing I can measure is how fast an objectis moving past me.If you come along and ask me "But how fast was it reallymoving ?", that'sa meaningless question. There's no such thing as 'real' motion, only motioncompared to something.Notice that there's actually no such thing as "at rest", or "motionless".If I measure the speed of something and it turns out to be zero, thenthat only means that the object and I are both moving at the same speedand in the same direction.Example ? Sure. How about the book in your lap, that you were readinguntil you drifted off in your comfortable reclining seat, on a passenger jetthat I observe to be 5 miles above the ground moving at 350 miles an hour.
Shadows appear because a light source is blocked by an object. For example, by standing outside on a sunny day, a person's body obstructs the sun's path of light and thus is unable to allow the light source to pass through, causing a 'dark spot' on the ground in the shape of their body.
Take the example of a book resting on a table. The downward force of the book's weight is matched exactly by the upward resistance of the table - hence the book remains where it is. (If the table was very flimsy, and unable to support the weight of the book, the book would accelerate towards the ground.)
yes, it would because of the disperse in weight on the object will allow less force to be applied.
no
A floating object has a density less than what it is floating in. If an object has more density than the medium it is placed in, the medium will be unable to hold the object. The object will, therefore, sink.
Authorities in Australia have been unable to eradicate the cane toad. It remains a pest with an ever-increasing range.
Unable to say, as this will depend on the plastic resin, the filler material, if a blowing agent was used to foam the plastic, and the size/shape of the object.
It would have been far simpler and quicker to use your calculator but since you are unable or unwilling to make that effort, the answer is 2.1
No, we would be unable to perceive the object. Have you ever seen a computer animation of a four dimensional object? It would be impossible to exist as a tangible object.
You will be unable to see, or unclearly see, the object in which you are viewing.
Experience a gradual reduction of chromosome length with each replication cycle.
No. In fact efforts are likely to increase. That is provided you continue to make no effort to pay, or are unable to bring the account current.
An attractive nuisance is a hazardous object or condition which is likely to attract children who are unable to appreciate the risk posed by the object or condition, and to whom the landowner can be held liable for injuries.
An attractive nuisance is a hazardous object or condition which is likely to attract children who are unable to appreciate the risk posed by the object or condition, and to whom the landowner can be held liable for injuries.