If I understand the question correctly, you are asking whether a scientify *theory* can be revised as new evidence is presented, and the answer is YES.
This forms the entire foundation of science - any theory that cannot be revised is contrary to the scientific method; it has, in effect, become dogma.
Any theory that cannot be demonstrated through the available evidence must be rejected. So, if a scientist discovers new data that invalidates a previously working theory, then that theory is rejected by the scientific community.
A proposed scientific idea is called a hypothesis. This is a tentative explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through observations and experiments. If the hypothesis is supported by evidence, it may become a theory in the scientific community.
A theory is more accepted than a hypothesis because it is a well-substantiated explanation of a phenomenon based on scientific evidence, testing, and broader consensus among experts. Theories undergo rigorous testing and scrutiny, whereas a hypothesis is a proposed explanation that has yet to be fully tested or proven.
Scientists are most likely to change a scientific theory if new evidence contradicts the existing theory, if the theory fails to explain new observations accurately, or if a more comprehensive theory emerges that better explains the phenomena in question. Scientific theories are constantly refined and updated based on rigorous testing and evidence.
For a hypothesis to become a theory, it needs to be supported by numerous, well-designed experiments that consistently yield the same results. Additionally, the scientific community must widely accept the hypothesis as being a reliable explanation for the observed phenomena.
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is supported by a large body of evidence. It is stronger than a hypothesis, which is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through experimentation and observation but has not yet been extensively validated. The strength of a theory lies in its predictive power and ability to explain diverse observations.
whenever an experiment fails to confirm the theory it is no longer a theory ... it becomes a hypothesis
A scientific hypothesis can become a theory if the hypothesis is tested extensively and competing hypotheses are eliminated.
A hypothesis requires confirmation to advance to the status of theory.
The correct steps for the scientific method are: Observation Hypothesis Theory Scientific Law
A scientific theory
A scientific theory is more elaborated than a simple hypothesis and generally is validated by experiments.
scientific theory
A hypothesis is what you believe will happen when you do an experiment. Scientific theory is when you use the data you have received from an experiment and create an idea that best suits your results. A theory can be related back to your original hypothesis, the experiment can prove whether your hypothesis was right.
A hypothesis is an educated guess on the possibility of some phenomena while a scientific theory is when the phenomena is confirmed by observation.
A proposed scientific idea is called a hypothesis. This is a tentative explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through observations and experiments. If the hypothesis is supported by evidence, it may become a theory in the scientific community.
A theory
that would be either a hypothesis or theory