I believe you might be referring to an "Optical Illusion".
The image seen in a concave mirror can be either real or virtual. A real image is formed when light rays actually converge at a point, while a virtual image is formed when light rays only appear to converge. The characteristics of the image will depend on the distance of the object from the mirror and the mirror's focal length.
Yes. That's a good quick way to determine whether or not a real image exists. You can also use a piece of thin tissue paper, kleenex, or toilet paper, and see the image from the other side. Put a piece of photosensitive material there at the real image, and you get a permanent photo.
An image that can be seen but not projected on a screen is called a real image. Real images are formed when light rays converge at a point, creating a visible image that can be observed with the naked eye. They are not able to be projected onto a screen like virtual images.
A virtual image is not formed by real light rays. Instead, it appears to be located at a position where the light rays do not actually converge. This type of image is commonly seen in mirrors and lenses.
Real image can be caught on a screen. But virtual cannot be caugtht so Real image is formed due to convergence of rays but in case of virtual there are only diverging rays and so they appear to diverge from one point where virtual image is located But both real and virtual could be seen by human eyes. Same way real object would definitely give out diverging rays But virtual object is considered as converging rays are assumed to come from such virtual object
The image seen in a concave mirror can be either real or virtual. A real image is formed when light rays actually converge at a point, while a virtual image is formed when light rays only appear to converge. The characteristics of the image will depend on the distance of the object from the mirror and the mirror's focal length.
Yes. That's a good quick way to determine whether or not a real image exists. You can also use a piece of thin tissue paper, kleenex, or toilet paper, and see the image from the other side. Put a piece of photosensitive material there at the real image, and you get a permanent photo.
yes
An image that can be seen but not projected on a screen is called a real image. Real images are formed when light rays converge at a point, creating a visible image that can be observed with the naked eye. They are not able to be projected onto a screen like virtual images.
A virtual image is not formed by real light rays. Instead, it appears to be located at a position where the light rays do not actually converge. This type of image is commonly seen in mirrors and lenses.
direct opthalmoscope:- 1. magnify 15 times 2.central retina only seen 3. virtual & erect image indirect ophthalmoscope:- 1. magnify 5 times 2. peripheral retina seen 3. real & inverted image
It seems that something was seen over the city, but as to what it was is still debated.
example of Real Images are the images seen on screen on cinema and image form in the human retina. also image produced on the camera. An example of a Virtual image is your image in a flat bathroom mirror. The light rays reflect away from the mirrors and do not actually pass through the image of yourself. The general rule of thumb to follow is: if the light rays ACTUALLY pass through the image, then it is a real image.
the relationship is that in order to have an image u have to have a special type of attituede like nice and sweet also it ddepends on the type of person and there attitude ^^^ Don't listen to this whatsoever. Now, the attitude of the image describes whether the image is upright or inverted, correct? And the type of image is real or virtual. Now, the relationship between the two is the same for all types of mirrors/lenses. With concave mirrors, when the image is real then it is inverted, whereas when it's virtual it is upright. With convex mirrors when the image is virtual it is also upright, and although I haven't seen a real image on convex mirror ray diagrams, theoretically if the image was real it would be inverted. With a diverging lens if the image is virtual it is upright and as with the convex lens although I have never seen a real image on a ray diagram for a diverging lens it would theoretically be inverted. Finally, with a converging lens if the image is real then it's inverted and if it's virtual it is upright. So, the relationship between attitude and image is this: If the type of image is real, the attitude of the image is inverted. If the type of image is virtual, the attitude of the image is upright.
It only means that you have seen attractive black men, perhaps in real life or in the media. The man in your dream is only an image that represents qualities that you like. He is not real and does not represent anyone you will meet in the future; he is quite literally a figment of your imagination.
The fact is that virtual images are the only ones we see directly with the eye. It is very difficult to see a full real image, you can only see parts of it. A virtual image is one where the light rays appear to come from a points in space. The eye can't tell the difference between light rays that come from a point on a real object, and light rays that approach the eye in the exact same angles as ones from that point on a object. I can take an object you are looking at, remove it but replace it with light sources that duplicate the angles that points on that object produce light, and you could not see the difference. The reason is that the only way we see the object is from the light coming from it and if we can "simulate" that light we will make that object appear real to the eye. The same happens with real images, because the light from a real image also replicates the angles of the light from an object, but the light is limited lo a small range because of the lens aperture, so we can only see parts of the image (the light cones defining a real image are narrow and limited by the lens aperture). NOTE: a screen makes a real image visible by scattering the light from the image so that it can be seen from a wide range of angles.
Because for some reason the image could not be 'read' by the email program.