You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
A scientific law is the description of a recurring event that occurs in nature. A scientific theory is an explanation of the law. The law does not change, but the theory may change when new data indicate that it needs to.
A scientific theory is an explanation supported by evidence and can be modified as new evidence is discovered. A scientific law is a description of a natural phenomenon that is consistent and often expressed mathematically, without explaining why it happens.
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world based on a body of evidence and observations. Laws, on the other hand, are descriptions of natural phenomena that have been observed to occur consistently. A theory explains why something happens, while a law simply describes what happens. Thus, a theory cannot become a law because they serve different purposes within the scientific framework.
In science, a theory and a law serve different purposes. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is supported by evidence and can be repeatedly tested and verified, while a scientific law is a statement that describes a pattern in nature. The distinction between the two is based on the level of understanding and evidence supporting them, with theories typically being more complex and comprehensive than laws.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
A law cannot become a theory, as laws are higher in scientific hierarchy than theories. Theories may become laws when the evidence for their factuality proves that the theory meets all established requirements set forth by the theory. If at any point in the scientific method a theory is disproven for the criteria that it sets forth, it can never be considered a Law. The hierarchy is thusly: Hypothesis < Theory < Law.
Answer this question… What can a hypothesis become if it is supported by repeated experimentation?
A scientific theory become a law when it is widely recognized and accepted by the scientific community in the epoch.
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
A theory explains how something works - a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
The other way around. Its hard to become a theory.
Scientific laws are actually part of scientific theories. A law is a succinct statement of some scientific principle, often in mathematical form. For example, within Darwin's theory of evolution, we find the law of survival of the fittest.
no