No, you can be both good and evil. This is the same concept. The object is either a good absorber or a good reflector, and can not be both. Black is a good absorber, white is a good reflector.
No, an object cannot be a good absorber and a good reflector at the same time. When an object absorbs light well, it does not reflect much of it, and vice versa. The ability of an object to absorb or reflect light depends on its properties and the material it is made of.
A good absorber of radiation is a good emitter. Radiation is the energy that that comes from a source and travels through space or through something. Some examples of radiation include light, heat and sound.
Marble is neither a good radiator reflector nor a good absorber. It has poor thermal conductivity and will not efficiently reflect or absorb heat. Materials with higher thermal conductivity, such as metals, are better suited for these purposes.
An object that is a good radiator of electromagnetic waves is also a good source of energy (heat,light ...)
Not necessarily. An object can be a good emitter of heat without being a good reflector of heat. The ability to emit and reflect heat depends on different properties of the material, such as surface texture and composition.
No, an object cannot be a good absorber and a good reflector at the same time. When an object absorbs light well, it does not reflect much of it, and vice versa. The ability of an object to absorb or reflect light depends on its properties and the material it is made of.
Common sense. Is something is reflected, it cannot be absorbed, and vice versa. If something is a good absorber of heat, it tries to "hold onto" as much heat as possible; if something is a poor reflector of heat, it is bad at minimizing heat absorption.
A good absorber of radiation is a good emitter. Radiation is the energy that that comes from a source and travels through space or through something. Some examples of radiation include light, heat and sound.
An object is a good emitter of radiation if it is a good absorber of radiation.
Marble is neither a good radiator reflector nor a good absorber. It has poor thermal conductivity and will not efficiently reflect or absorb heat. Materials with higher thermal conductivity, such as metals, are better suited for these purposes.
Any object that can specifically absorb and emit radiation (in the form of, say, infrared radiation), is called a selective absorbers. An example is: Snow. It is a good absorber of infrared radiation but poor absorber of sunligh. Object that selectively absorb radiation at some wavelength tend to radiate radiation at that same wavelength. CO2 and water vapors are both very good absorber of infrared radiation but at the same time poor absorber of different forms of solar radiation that are visible to us.
An object that is a good radiator of electromagnetic waves is also a good source of energy (heat,light ...)
An object that is a good absorber of radiation is classified as a good emitter of radiation. It is known as a black body radiator, which absorbs and emits radiation efficiently across a wide range of wavelengths.
Not necessarily. An object can be a good emitter of heat without being a good reflector of heat. The ability to emit and reflect heat depends on different properties of the material, such as surface texture and composition.
Yes it is a good absorber. There are many reasons why it is a good absorber. One of the reasons is because it is very porous.
it absorbs moisture which may be caused by heat it may also be a good absorber for dirt and dust
the moon , frosted glass, aluminium