0
Though many claim to have created "methods" to communicate with ghosts, it is highly questionable! There are people who claim that they can talk to "ghosts" and can tell you what they want and ect. Again it is highly possible that these are fakes.
But the only method that I believe can provide some proof for extra natural is through the EM field fluctuations.
What else can I help you with?
Is there ghosts at the howard school?
There are many ghosts at the howard school
Which scientists do not believe in ghosts?
Many scientists do not believe in ghosts because there is no scientific evidence to support their existence. Ghosts are generally seen as a phenomenon that falls more into the realm of culture, folklore, and belief systems rather than scientific inquiry. Scientists prioritize evidence-based explanations for the world around us, which typically do not include supernatural entities like ghosts.
Do ghosts prove the existence of God?
The only valid proof of the existence of ghosts or of gods or of anything at all is the proof by example. Someone must produce a ghost or a god or a heffalump which is verified by the senses (non-distorting aids like telescopes, microscopes, and amplifiers are OK, transformative aids like Photoshop are not) of experts judged to be credible both by believers in the idea in question and by nonbelievers. Until a ghost or a god is produced for public evaluation their existence may be considered doubtful but unproven.
What does science say about ghosts?
Some scientists believe in ghosts but some discovered that they were fakeAnother Answer:There is no scientific evidence supporting the existence of ghosts. Some people, however, believe in them. It is a matter of faith, not science. Non believers discount ghosts as figments of imagination, hallucinations, or mental illness, etc. Others, myself included, have seen them, sometimes in quite rational circumstances but, right now, science does not explain nor support ghosts.
What proof is there to prove that ghosts exist?
There is no scientific evidence that proves the existence of ghosts. Reports of ghost sightings and experiences are largely based on personal anecdotes and beliefs, which can vary greatly from one person to another. Without concrete, reproducible evidence, the existence of ghosts remains a matter of personal interpretation and belief.
Is there ghosts at the howard school?
There are many ghosts at the howard school
Does ghosts poop?
Scientists can't even prove that ghosts are real and if they were (which I don't believe), it probably wouldn't be any more toxic than that from a human.
Is continued existence after death scientifically possible?
So far scientists have not been able to prove or disprove existence after death.
Supernatural in a sentence?
Ghosts are considered to be supernatural for most people and scientists can not prove they exist or don't exist.
Are there gay ghosts?
The chance of the existence of gay ghosts is exactly the same as the existence of straight ghosts.
Which scientists do not believe in ghosts?
Many scientists do not believe in ghosts because there is no scientific evidence to support their existence. Ghosts are generally seen as a phenomenon that falls more into the realm of culture, folklore, and belief systems rather than scientific inquiry. Scientists prioritize evidence-based explanations for the world around us, which typically do not include supernatural entities like ghosts.
Do ghosts prove the existence of God?
The only valid proof of the existence of ghosts or of gods or of anything at all is the proof by example. Someone must produce a ghost or a god or a heffalump which is verified by the senses (non-distorting aids like telescopes, microscopes, and amplifiers are OK, transformative aids like Photoshop are not) of experts judged to be credible both by believers in the idea in question and by nonbelievers. Until a ghost or a god is produced for public evaluation their existence may be considered doubtful but unproven.
What does science say about ghosts?
Some scientists believe in ghosts but some discovered that they were fakeAnother Answer:There is no scientific evidence supporting the existence of ghosts. Some people, however, believe in them. It is a matter of faith, not science. Non believers discount ghosts as figments of imagination, hallucinations, or mental illness, etc. Others, myself included, have seen them, sometimes in quite rational circumstances but, right now, science does not explain nor support ghosts.
What proof is there to prove that ghosts exist?
There is no scientific evidence that proves the existence of ghosts. Reports of ghost sightings and experiences are largely based on personal anecdotes and beliefs, which can vary greatly from one person to another. Without concrete, reproducible evidence, the existence of ghosts remains a matter of personal interpretation and belief.
Are there such things as a haunted house?
Some people believe so others are more sceptical. There is no scientific evidence to prove the existence of ghosts but there is a large body of written statements from people who have seen what they believe to be ghosts.
Evidence against the existence of ghosts?
There is little to no evidence against the existence of ghosts. Alot of people believe that ghosts do not exist, simply because their existence has not been scientifically proven, and the idea sounds ludicrous to a scientific mind. There have been countless cases where evidence has been presented to prove the existence of ghosts, but has turned out to be a hoax. Alot of people will invent stories and contruct fake photographs in an attempt to become well known, and others just happen to experience a funny conicidence. Because of the sheer number of hoaxes and fake photographs, many people are disinclined to believe in ghosts, but there is no evidence yet to disprove their existence.
What percentage of the worlds scientists believe in ghosts?
True scientists are not fool to believe in ghosts.
