Scientific laws can be revised, although that doesn't happen very often. New observations and new analyses of observations can lead to revisions of theories, including the laws that are contained in those theories. An example of this concerns the law of conservation of mass. This law still applies in its original form to chemical reactions, but it has also been discovered that due to the mass-energy equivalency that was first described by Einstein, mass is not always conserved, and a better formulation of the law is that mass-energy is conserved.
A scientific law is a statement describing observable phenomena. Laws are based on repeated observations and experimentation, so they are not typically "broken." If an event seems to contradict a scientific law, it may indicate a limitation in our understanding or a need to revise the law.
A scientist would likely be less inclined to revise her experimental methods if the results consistently align with established scientific principles, if the methods have been extensively validated in prior studies, and if there is strong consensus within the scientific community on the efficacy of the methods used.
A scientific law is the description of a recurring event that occurs in nature. A scientific theory is an explanation of the law. The law does not change, but the theory may change when new data indicate that it needs to.
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
A scientific theory is an explanation supported by evidence and can be modified as new evidence is discovered. A scientific law is a description of a natural phenomenon that is consistent and often expressed mathematically, without explaining why it happens.
A reason to revise scientific knowledge is this is not a easy subject and we always have to study carefully and revise it.
A scientific law is a statement describing observable phenomena. Laws are based on repeated observations and experimentation, so they are not typically "broken." If an event seems to contradict a scientific law, it may indicate a limitation in our understanding or a need to revise the law.
revise the conclusions.
edenham students trying to cheat and revise scientist theories?? you do that urself
One example of scientific law, is The Law Of Gravity.
One example of scientific law, is The Law Of Gravity.
Scientific law is proven (for the most part) and scientific theory is not proven yet."However scientific law is a law that cannot be broken.
the value of scientific law is the set of observations...
A regular law has to do with the judicial system. A scientific law has to do with science.
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
Scientific law means it WILL happen and i don't remeber scientific theroy. Sorry!
A scientific law can be demonstrated and experimewntally validated.