No, sonar didn't affect the outcome of World War I. Sonar and electronics technology were not far enough advanced to make a difference in the era from 1910 to 1920. Certainly the war spurred the efforts to develop sonar, but it didn't come far enough fast enough to have any significant effect on WWI at all. A link is provided to the Wikipedia article on sonar, and the section on "History" is brief and easy to read. Why not surf on over and check it out? Our friends there supply knowledge for free.
The first documented use of sonar was during World War I by the British Royal Navy to detect submarines. The technology was further developed during World War II for anti-submarine warfare.
Sonar was gradually developed and improved over many years, but the first operational form of sonar as we now know it goes back to about 1918.
Sonar was first used during World War I by the British Royal Navy. It was used to detect submarines by emitting sound waves and analyzing the echoes that bounced back.
I believe that Lewis Nixon was 45 when he invented sonar. He was born in 1861. Kelly Nixon Mayr
Lewis Nixon helped develop sonar technology while working at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C. during World War II. Sonar, which stands for Sound Navigation and Ranging, was instrumental in detecting and tracking submarines.
Sonar helped map the ocean floor
it didnt
Yes
lazaj jubbi frist they fight for the world
It didnt really affect the war that much. the attack was to small to affect it very much.
Japan would surrender thus ending World War 2
it ended the war. Japan surrendered without conditions.
North Carolina affected the outcome of WW2 by purchacing tons of federal stamps and by training troops.
Sonar
sonar
yes
It didn't; Submarine Sonar wasn't developed until the '30's, and during WWII it saw limited use aboard submarines. Back then, it was essentially a bearing / speed indicator for a target, but not much more.