Robots can have arms legs wheels tracks, or whatever else you want
No, robots do not have to move to be considered a robot. Movement is just one characteristic of robots, but they can still be classified as robots based on their ability to perform tasks autonomously or semi-autonomously, even if they are stationary.
I think that big robots because they make bigger steps than the smaller robots...;)
Robots can move using various mechanisms, including wheels, tracks, legs, and propellers. These mechanisms are powered by motors or other actuators that provide the necessary force and motion for the robot to navigate its environment. Additionally, some robots can also move by crawling, hopping, or flying, depending on their design and intended tasks.
Most robots copy the human hand and arm because of their versatility and precision in interacting with the environment. Mimicking these body parts allows robots to perform a wide range of tasks in various industries such as manufacturing, healthcare, and food service.
Yes, different types of gravity can affect robots. Robots designed to operate in environments with different levels of gravity (such as on Earth, the moon, or Mars) need to be calibrated and programmed accordingly to ensure proper functionality and mobility. Changes in gravity can impact the robot's stability, movement capabilities, and energy consumption.
No it is not necessary that all robots have arms and legs. Some robots have only arms and some have legs and some have wheels for their mobility. Basically it depends on the requirements as the requirements dictate how we design our robots. For example in automobile industries robots are used only for welding purposes or in paintshop. These types of robots have only arms not legs.
No.
false
Robotic arms are often called prosthetic arms if they are on a person. If it is a robotic arm on a machine, then it is called a robotic arm.
No, not all robots have a head, arms, and legs. Robots come in various forms and designs, tailored for specific functions, such as industrial robots, which may have static structures, or drones that lack limbs altogether. Some robots may be wheeled or tracked, while others are designed as simple automated systems without a humanoid appearance. The design of a robot largely depends on its intended purpose and operational environment.
Use loop to tie them up
First a common trait of machines and robots: They are both mechanical devices operated through computer programming to perform task.
No, robots do not have to move to be considered a robot. Movement is just one characteristic of robots, but they can still be classified as robots based on their ability to perform tasks autonomously or semi-autonomously, even if they are stationary.
No. What you're referring to would be called a humanoid(=human-shaped) robot, and those are actually quite rare. Most robots today are industrial robots, and they look entirely different.
Robots do not necessarily have heads, arms, and legs like humans; their design varies widely based on their intended function. Some robots, like humanoid robots, are built to resemble humans and may have limbs and a head, while others are designed for specific tasks and may have a more utilitarian shape, lacking human-like features altogether. The focus in robotics is often on functionality and efficiency rather than mimicking human anatomy.
No, not all robots have a head, arms, and legs like humans. Robots come in various designs tailored to their specific functions, ranging from simple machines like robotic arms to autonomous drones or wheeled vehicles that don't resemble human anatomy at all. Their structure is determined by the tasks they are meant to perform, which can vary widely across industries and applications.
Definitely not, you can have something like R2D2 (though he kind of has legs) which is a box powered by wheels[?].Robots can also:fly (wings instead of arms)tunnel (drills)underwatereven stationary.So no, robots do not necessarily require limbs.