No, antimatter does not possess negative mass. Antimatter has the same mass as regular matter, but opposite charge.
The antimatter equivalent of a proton is an antiproton. It has the same mass as a proton but opposite charge.
Electrons possess a negative charge.
If you were to touch antimatter, it would result in a violent and explosive reaction, releasing a large amount of energy. This is because when antimatter comes into contact with regular matter, they annihilate each other, converting their mass into energy.
Sir Issac Newton proposed theory of gravity. He formulated the relation between the force of gravity and the mass and the distance between the masses. This theory failed to explain as to why there is attraction between the masses and not repulsion. With every attraction you have to have corresponding repulsion. That problem is resolved with the discovery of antimatter. So like attracts like. So matter attracts matter and antimatter attracts antimatter. This fallows that matter repel antimatter. So force of gravity between the two masses of matter or two masses of antimatter is directly proportional to the product of masses or anti-masses (Antimatter). The force of repulsion will be directly proportional to the product of mass and anti-mass (Antimatter). It fallows that the force of repulsion is inversely proportional to square of distance between the two.
Antimatter has mass like ordinary matter. When antimatter comes in contact with matter, they annihilate each other while releasing energy, as described by Einstein's equation E=mc^2. So, in that sense, antimatter has weight due to its mass.
"Antimatter" is not negative mass. Mass is a positive quantity for both matter and antimatter. So gravity is always attractive, even if one of the masses in the relationship happens to be antimatter. If such a thing as negative mass exists, then the forces between it and a lump of normal mass would be repulsive ones. Antimatter is observed routinely, but no evidence of negative mass has ever been observed. When matter & antimatter annihilate energy is released per E = mc2 where m corresponds to the sum of their masses. If the antimatter had negative mass then instead of a positron/electron annihilation releasing energy corresponding to twice the electron mass (as it does) the mass of the electron and negative mass of the positron would cancel resulting in no energy release (this does not happen). This proves that both matter & antimatter have positive mass, without even referring to gravity. As they both have positive mass their gravity will be attractive not repulsive.
Sir Issac Newton proposed the law of gravitational force between mass to mass of matter. That is the gravitational force between to masses is directly proportional to the product of masses and inversely proportional to the square of distance between the two. F=G* m1*m2/r2. Here the F is the force of gravity. G is gravitational constant. m1 is mass one. m2 is mass 2. r is the distance between the masses. Now for the two masses of antimatter you have to denote the negative sign to the mass. So the formula is F = G* minus m1 * minus m2 / r2. So here the F is positive number. So there will be force of attraction between the two masses of antimatter. Hence proved.Now you take one mass of matter and another mass of antimatter. The formula is F = G * m1* minus m2 / r2. Here the F is negative number. So there is no force of attraction between the two. Instead there is force of repulsion. So the force of repulsion between the mass of matter and mass of antimatter is directly proportional to the product of masses of matter and antimatter and inversely proportional to the square of distance between the two. Hence proved.So above is the mathematical proof of the gravitational force between the masses of antimatter and antimatter and gravitational force between the masses of antimatter and matter.
The antimatter equivalent of a proton is an antiproton. It has the same mass as a proton but opposite charge.
No. There is really no such thing as negative mass. Even antimatter has mass, which is always a positive (that is, greater-than-zero) quantity. There is, however, the concept of effective mass or apparent mass, which can be negative. When an object is submerged in water, its apparent weight is reduced by an amount equivalent to the weight of water it displaces. For example, if a 10-pound rock is dropped into a bucket of water and displaces one pound of water, the effective weight of the rock under water is nine pounds. But what if you submerge something much less dense than a rock -- say, your little brother's head -- in the bucket? Okay, forget that. Let's says a big ball of Styrofoam, instead. (Not as eco-friendly but less violent.) In that case, the weight of the water displaced by the ball will be far greater than the actual weight of the ball, so when you subtract the weight of the water from the weight of the ball, you'll get a negative number. In other words, the effective weight of the ball under water will be negative, and the ball will tend to rise. It will fight your efforts to submerge it, much as your brother would if you submerged his head (but for reasons other than mere buoyancy).
Unless its positive, in which case it would be a positron which is antimatter.
Yes, gram-negative bacteria possess lipopolysaccharides.
An atom of antimatter does not contain any electrons. The equivalent of an electron in antimatter is a positron, which has charge +1.
Electrons possess a negative charge.
If you were to touch antimatter, it would result in a violent and explosive reaction, releasing a large amount of energy. This is because when antimatter comes into contact with regular matter, they annihilate each other, converting their mass into energy.
Yes, gram-negative bacteria possess an outer membrane.
Yes, Gram-negative bacteria possess an outer membrane.
Positive, positron's are the antimatter equivalent of an electron and therefor the charge is reversed.